Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): > On 22-06-18 18:05, Ian Jackson wrote: > It currently happens quite often, but often the test suite from testing > runs happily with the package from unstable. If the (passing) results >

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ian, On 22-06-18 18:05, Ian Jackson wrote: > AIUI what you are promposing is, when A's tests are being run for B's > migration: > > * tell autopkgtest to run the tests from A in testing, with an apt >configuration which pins B from unstable. > > * autopkgtest runs an apt solver to

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): > Which option did you have in mind? I don't spot anything that isn't in > autopkgtest either, but I didn't read carefully. I think you would have to take more manual control and pass an

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ian, On 22-06-18 15:25, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder > (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): >> I think it _is_ optional. At least, it was in adt-run. I think >> autopkgtest has much of the same logic. It's a question of putting

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): > I think it _is_ optional. At least, it was in adt-run. I think > autopkgtest has much of the same logic. It's a question of putting > together the right rune to specify what you want.

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): > On 22-06-18 15:02, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I don't know exactly what autopkgtest command line rune you are using > > but certainly it was designed to be able to run the test suite of one >

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ian, On 22-06-18 15:02, Ian Jackson wrote: > Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder > (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): >> On 22-06-18 12:45, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> But that is appropriate, because the new git Breaks earlier versions >>> of dgit. AIUI

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Ian Jackson
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): > On 22-06-18 12:45, Ian Jackson wrote: > > to the bad run which prompted your intervention, and the good run > > which resulted ? > > [2] for the bad one. You already found the good one:

Bug#896023: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)

2018-06-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Ian, [Dropping bug 901897 as that has nothing to do with it; adding 896023 as it is worth explaining it there if that bug isn't clear yet.] On 22-06-18 12:45, Ian Jackson wrote: > Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#901897 closed by Jonathan Nieder > (Bug#901897: fixed in git 1:2.18.0~rc2-2)"): >>