On 08/24/2018 01:38 PM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:41:17 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote :
>> I prefer to package 2.1.fb66, as this is what OpenStack gates on.
>
> OK. The difference is minor because version 2.1.fb66 and 2.1.fb67 differ
> only by a single com
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:41:17 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote :
> I prefer to package 2.1.fb66, as this is what OpenStack gates on.
OK. The difference is minor because version 2.1.fb66 and 2.1.fb67 differ
only by a single commit.
> Could you explain this?
> https://salsa.debian.org/cvubru
On 08/24/2018 09:56 AM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thank you for upgrading the python-rtslib-fb package but I believe some
> important changes are missing in the new package.
>
> * The main repository of python-rtslib-fb is now hosted by the
>Open-iSCSI organization on Git
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for upgrading the python-rtslib-fb package but I believe some
important changes are missing in the new package.
* The main repository of python-rtslib-fb is now hosted by the
Open-iSCSI organization on GitHub and the latest version there is
newer 2.1.fb67 (instead of 2
4 matches
Mail list logo