Bug#903500: python-rstlib-fb: I believe some changes are missing

2018-08-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/24/2018 01:38 PM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:41:17 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote : >> I prefer to package 2.1.fb66, as this is what OpenStack gates on. > > OK. The difference is minor because version 2.1.fb66 and 2.1.fb67 differ > only by a single com

Bug#903500: python-rstlib-fb: I believe some changes are missing

2018-08-24 Thread Christophe Vu-Brugier
Hi Thomas, On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:41:17 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote : > I prefer to package 2.1.fb66, as this is what OpenStack gates on. OK. The difference is minor because version 2.1.fb66 and 2.1.fb67 differ only by a single commit. > Could you explain this? > https://salsa.debian.org/cvubru

Bug#903500: python-rstlib-fb: I believe some changes are missing

2018-08-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/24/2018 09:56 AM, Christophe Vu-Brugier wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for upgrading the python-rtslib-fb package but I believe some > important changes are missing in the new package. > > * The main repository of python-rtslib-fb is now hosted by the >Open-iSCSI organization on Git

Bug#903500: python-rstlib-fb: I believe some changes are missing

2018-08-24 Thread Christophe Vu-Brugier
Hi Thomas, Thank you for upgrading the python-rtslib-fb package but I believe some important changes are missing in the new package. * The main repository of python-rtslib-fb is now hosted by the Open-iSCSI organization on GitHub and the latest version there is newer 2.1.fb67 (instead of 2