Package: webext-lightbeam
Followup-For: Bug #904933
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 patch
It does have a major effect on the usability of a package by
preventing user from installing it in the first place (i.e., Raspberry
Pi with a limited free space on an SD card).
There is
Carsten Schoenert writes:
> Instead of discussing the severity of the bug report it would be more
> helpful
It is much more helpful to read original message in full:
> Yes, it uses 4 OpenSans-*.ttf fonts. fonts-open-sans already provides
> these fonts and is about 2 Mbytes in size.
> I've
Hi,
Am 10.02.19 um 23:31 schrieb Mykola Nikishov:
> Carsten Schoenert writes:
>
>> The issue in question isn't breaking any policy, raises security issues,
>> makes the package not usable or is provoking any data loss, so a
>> severity of critical, grave or serious isn't a correct tagging.
>>
Carsten Schoenert writes:
> The issue in question isn't breaking any policy, raises security issues,
> makes the package not usable or is provoking any data loss, so a
> severity of critical, grave or serious isn't a correct tagging.
> Decreasing the severity to normal.
>
> [1]
Control: severity -1 normal
Hello Mykola,
Am 09.02.19 um 15:52 schrieb Mykola Nikishov:
>> I mean, why should a browser extension which seems to have no relation
>> to TeX install 1 GB of fonts which are considered "extra" from TeX
>> Live's point of view?
>
> In my opinion this bug deserves a
Package: webext-lightbeam
Followup-For: Bug #904933
severity -1 grave
thanks
Axel Beckert writes:
> webext-lightbeam pulls in texlive-fonts-extra which has 1 GB of
> installed size. Is this hard dependency really _required_?
Yes, it uses 4 OpenSans-*.ttf fonts. fonts-open-sans already
6 matches
Mail list logo
