On 9/16/2018 4:40 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I don't think it's util-linux place to document how systemd (or any
> other similar system) works. Certainly not as a downstream debian patch.
>
> In my opinion this is basically a misdirected bug report that I'd
> suggest tag wontfix and close.
Control: tags -1 + upstream wontfix
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:59:43PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> reopen 905528
> reassign 905528 util-linux
> retitle 905528 nofail flag description misleading
> thanks
>
> I misunderstood the description before. I interpreted it as using
> nofail still
reopen 905528
reassign 905528 util-linux
retitle 905528 nofail flag description misleading
thanks
I misunderstood the description before. I interpreted it as using
nofail still causes boot failure. After offline discussion with the
reporter, he was saying that the man page for mount and fstab
Control: reassign -1 systemd-sysv
* Seamus de Mora [180812 18:02]:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.29.2-1+deb9u1
> Severity: normal
[..]
> Distributor ID: Raspbian
> Description: Raspbian GNU/Linux 9.4 (stretch)
> Codename: stretch
[..]
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Reassigning to
sysvinit called mount -a to handle mounting devices at boot. Unless you
are still refusing to move to systemd, mount is on longer responsible
for this so the problem must be in systemd.
On 8/5/2018 11:44 AM, Seamus de Mora wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.29.2-1+deb9u1
> Severity: normal
>
Package: mount
Version: 2.29.2-1+deb9u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I have modified the file at `/etc/fstab` to add instructions to `mount` for
mounting a "USB thumb drive" (LABEL=SANDISK16GB); please see the file
contents below. Note the use of the `nofail` option. When I omit this
6 matches
Mail list logo
