On 8/27/18 3:07 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
I believe you both misunderstand the current issue at hand. In Debian we
default to OpenJDK 10 at the moment and soon OpenJDK 11 because this
will be the only supported (security wise) runtime environment for
Debian 10 "Buster". [...]
Thanks for the
Am 27.08.2018 um 07:32 schrieb Per Lundberg:
> On 8/26/18 12:46 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> I believe we should tighten the dependency on default-jre-headless. We
>> currently have for tomcat8-common:
>>
>> default-jre-headless | java8-runtime-headless | java8-runtime
>>
>> We should simply
Hi,
I suppose this a maintainer decision (compile with java8 or 10) but the
bug in #895866 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=895866
seems to indicate that tomcat8 implies java8 compatibility.
I would certainly preferred it that way.
Vassilis
Sorry for the duplication I
On 8/26/18 12:46 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
I believe we should tighten the dependency on default-jre-headless. We
currently have for tomcat8-common:
default-jre-headless | java8-runtime-headless | java8-runtime
We should simply change that to
default-jre-headless (>= 10) |
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 20:50:14 +0300 Vassilis Virvilis
wrote:
[...]
> With java8 installed I am getting the following. Isn't this the sign that is
> compiled again against java9/java10?
>
> 2018-08-17 16:20:46] [crit] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>
Package: tomcat8
Version: 8.5.32-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
Hi,
* What led up to the situation?
With java8 installed I am getting the following. Isn't this the sign that is
compiled again against
6 matches
Mail list logo
