The Anti Harassment Team must be disbanded immediately and without recourse
as its name is offensive. It contains the word "ass." Unless of course it
is a reference to the intelligence of its members.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:02:34 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Ferrari?= <
tin...@debian.org> wrote:
Pandering to the monkeys is hardly a way to run your organization. Have you
checked how many OTHER packages are named with the letters "boob" in your
repo? Please. The correct decision is to tell the monkeys to get a life.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 01:02:34 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=c3=adn_Ferrari?= <
Dear Martín et al.,
> For further clarification, this means that we believe there is time
> until the freeze to solve this issue
Indeed and I remain optimistic that this can be achieved before we
reach for the RM "hammer". Romain, can you chime in here?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Chris et al,
On 26/10/18 15:31, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> I am concerned about the lack of progress. I would be grateful
>> for advice on what I should do next.
>
> I was led to believe — althought naturally feel very free to correct
> me — that the AH team were (quite correctly,) handling this
isn't there something more productive to do with y'alls time?
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:48 AM Ian Jackson <
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> > I was led to believe — althought naturally feel very free to
> > correct
Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> I was led to believe — althought naturally feel very free to
> correct me — that the AH team were (quite correctly,) handling this
> issue and thus I have not been taking action on it myself as
> leader@.
>
> I therefore also
Dear Ian,
> > I look forward to hearing from the Debian maintainer, who I think is
> > the first point of contact for the management of the package in
> > Debian.
>
> I am concerned about the lack of progress. I would be grateful for
> advice on what I should do next.
I was led to believe —
Martín Ferrari writes ("Re: Should the weboob package stay in Debian?"):
> I am writing on behalf of the Anti-Harassment team, as our input has
> been requested on this issue.
Thanks for your considered and helpful response.
>our recommendation would be to either work with
> upstream on
Hi all,
I am writing on behalf of the Anti-Harassment team, as our input has
been requested on this issue.
Our understanding, after reading the mail threads and bug reports, is
that the package in its current shape is against the Debian CoC ("be
respectful") -- while it's not a "flagrant"
9 matches
Mail list logo
