> > I am not sure, but is there something specific to x86_64 in this
> > implementation or does it fit also for i386?
>
> I admit I have no idea. However, usually upstream of this type of
> software is concentrating on amd64 exclusively since this is what is
> practically used for gene
Hello Andreas,
>> But even if this implementation is copied then later a file atomic64.h
>> is missing, that exists for x86_64 but not i386.
>
> Am I understand correctly that this might be a good reason to make
> ncbi-vdb amd64 only?
Probably it was too late yesterday, because today I cannot
Hi Bernhard,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> Hello,
> just tried to find out why the i386 build is failing.
Thanks a lot for the investigation.
> I think the fault lies in libncbi-vdb-dev, as it does not
> supply an implementation for i386 for function
Hello,
just tried to find out why the i386 build is failing.
I think the fault lies in libncbi-vdb-dev, as it does not
supply an implementation for i386 for function uint64_msbit,
like it does for x86_64.
(And it should probably use something like "-Wl,--no-undefined".)
The implementation for
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove sra-sdk for architecture i386 to enable migration of a bug free
amd64 version in sid.
Kind regards
Andreas.
5 matches
Mail list logo
