Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: severity -1 important Downgrading severity, since the autopkgtests now pass in unstable [1], to avoid autoremoval warnings in several other packages. [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-etm/unstable/amd64/

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Sure I'll agree - just do whatever you consider sensible. Thanks, Andreas. On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:11:51AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: tags -1 + patch > > Hi Andreas > > Your patch fixed the autopkgtest on amd64 and armhf, but now it fails > on i386, arm64,

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-20 Thread Graham Inggs
Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 + patch Hi Andreas Your patch fixed the autopkgtest on amd64 and armhf, but now it fails on i386, arm64, ppc64el and s390x. Instead of a patch, how about simply filtering the offending line from the saved results, as below? If you agree, I'll upload with

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2019-07-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, I realised that you published a new version but the issue with the test suite remains (partially): Test test.etmCIF passed --- tests.etm.Rout.save_2019-07-17 05:55:30.013900516 + +++ tests.etm.Rout_ 2019-07-17 05:55:30.017900518 + @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ 116 0.9990

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2018-10-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, it is definitely architecture dependand. I think the solution would be to do a comparison tollerating this micro-diffs. Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:35:02PM +0200, Arthur Allignol wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Totally forgot about

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2018-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: forwarded -1 Arthur Allignol Hi Arthur, there was a bug report filed against the Debian packaged version of etm. It seems the saved results are not matching the result of the test. Could you please comment on this - may be we are doing something wrong? Kind regards Andreas.

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2018-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 Arthur Allignol Hi Arthur, there was a bug report filed against the Debian packaged version of etm. It seems the saved results are not matching the result of the test. Could you please comment on this - may be we are doing something wrong? Kind

Bug#908662: r-cran-etm: autopkgtest regression: saved results mismatch

2018-09-12 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: r-cran-etm Version: 1.0.4-2 User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Hi R Package Team Now that #903672 has been resolved, we can see that r-cran-etm fails its autopkgtest [1] with the following errors: --- tests.etm.Rout.save_2018-09-10 10:04:21.100595425 +