Hi Amin,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:28:10PM -0500, Amin Bandali wrote:
> Whoops, you're quite right, sorry! I somehow misread/misunderstood the
> report. I have not tried your patch yet. Would you please share the
> exact series of commands used to attempt the above build, so I could try
> and
Hi Helmut,
Helmut Grohne writes:
> Hi Amin,
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:30:48AM -0500, Amin Bandali wrote:
>> I'm inclined to close this since Jami builds fine now.
>
> Doesn't look like that to me:
>
> http://crossqa.debian.net/build/ring_20201217.1.80217fa%7Eds1-2_arm64_20201229181656.log
>
Hi Amin,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 11:30:48AM -0500, Amin Bandali wrote:
> I'm inclined to close this since Jami builds fine now.
Doesn't look like that to me:
http://crossqa.debian.net/build/ring_20201217.1.80217fa%7Eds1-2_arm64_20201229181656.log
Did you try applying my patch?
Helmut
I'm inclined to close this since Jami builds fine now.
Alexandre?
--
Amin Bandali
Free Software Consultant
Savoir-faire Linux
jami:bandali
Source: ring
Version: 20180816.2.e26b79f~ds1-3
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
ring fails to cross build from source. Actually it simply performs a
native build and breaks when expected dependencies are unavailable. The
attached patch fixes quite a bit of that:
*
5 matches
Mail list logo
