Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On 14.03.19 23:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > On 13/03/2019 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. > > I got a quick look at these new versions released this week, IcedTea Web > 1.7.2 is rather close to the version in unstable since October and has a > few extra Java 9+ fixes, it's probably worth considering for Buster. see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-web/1.7.2-0ubuntu1 for a packaging proposal.
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On 13/03/2019 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote: > please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. I got a quick look at these new versions released this week, IcedTea Web 1.7.2 is rather close to the version in unstable since October and has a few extra Java 9+ fixes, it's probably worth considering for Buster. The version 1.8 doesn't seem to improve the Java 9+ compatibility and the new Rust based launcher looks like a big change I'd rather see in Bullseye. The upcoming version 1.9 looks interesting since it removes the applet code that is causing the FTBFS with Java 11 we are discussing here, but that will be too late for Buster. Emmanuel Bourg
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote: > > >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. May be that's sensible for Buster+1 > > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will > > be removed. I don't have a strong opinion in this case. If Michael's > > workaround works, why not. However I think it is too late now for new > > upstream releases as doko seems to imply. > > > > Please note there are several other RC issues that are marked as pending > > but I believe the "fix" is to remove the package from Debian. > > FYI I'm working on a fix, I plan to upload it next week if it works, or > the Michael's patch if it doesn't. Thanks a lot. We have simply several rdepends of this package which would be really hard if they get lost. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote: Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about this? >>> >>> In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to >>> upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. >> >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. >> > > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will > be removed. I don't have a strong opinion in this case. If Michael's > workaround works, why not. However I think it is too late now for new > upstream releases as doko seems to imply. > > Please note there are several other RC issues that are marked as pending > but I believe the "fix" is to remove the package from Debian. FYI I'm working on a fix, I plan to upload it next week if it works, or the Michael's patch if it doesn't. Emmanuel Bourg
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
Am 13.03.19 um 17:47 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 13.03.19 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about >>> this? >> >> In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to >> upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. > > please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will be removed. I don't have a strong opinion in this case. If Michael's workaround works, why not. However I think it is too late now for new upstream releases as doko seems to imply. Please note there are several other RC issues that are marked as pending but I believe the "fix" is to remove the package from Debian. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no=icedtea-web Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On 13.03.19 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about >> this? > > In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to > upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases.
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about > this? In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. Kind regards Andreas. > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912549#10 -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
Hi, Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about this? Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912549#10 -- http://fam-tille.de
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
Dear maintainers, I have a fix for this bug (by copying in the relevant files from OpenJDK 9) at https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/icedtea-web/merge_requests/5 It is a hack, but from my testing it works. I hope this is helpful; I would like to see this package stay in Debian Buster. Cheers, -- Michael R. Crusoe
Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11
Source: icedtea-web Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/icedtea-web.html ... hecking for distribution package version... 1.7.1 checking what version string to use... 1.7.1 (1.7.1) checking whether to build the browser plugin... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking whether to build plugin jar for javaws -html... no checking if java.util.jar.Pack200 is available from some.pkg (module "")... yes checking if java.net.CookieManager is available from some.pkg (module "")... yes checking if java.net.HttpCookie is available from some.pkg (module "")... yes checking if java.net.CookieHandler is available from some.pkg (module "")... yes checking if sun.security.util.SecurityConstants is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.security.util.HostnameChecker is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.security.x509.X500Name is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.security.util.HexDumpEncoder is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if jdk.internal.util.jar.JarIndex is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.security.validator.ValidatorException is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.X509ExtendedTrustManager is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.net.www.protocol.jar.URLJarFile is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.net.www.protocol.jar.URLJarFileCallBack is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.awt.X11.XEmbeddedFrame is available from some.pkg (module "java.desktop")... yes checking if com.sun.jndi.toolkit.url.UrlUtil is available from some.pkg (module "java.naming")... yes checking if sun.net.www.protocol.http.Handler is available from some.pkg (module "java.base")... yes checking if sun.applet.AppletImageRef is available from sun.applet (module "java.desktop")... no configure: error: sun.applet.AppletImageRef not found. make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 1
