Bug#912736: apt-listbugs and APT team (was: Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25)

2018-11-25 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi tl;dr: Please reply on de...@lists.debian.org & Francesco only. On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:25:00AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > Well, but the LICENSE file should still be a correct summary of the > debian/copyright file: that's why I was assuming they should be two The LICENSE file of a

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-16 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:25:00 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > If the maintainer field is set to , then I would > obviously need to subscribe to that list, and the e-mail traffic > related to apt-listbugs would be intermingled with the rest of > the messages directed there. I am not sure I can

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-15 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:47:31 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote: [...] > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > That sounds like a reasonable suggestion: how can I still ship it in > > the binary package? I guess I should add a debian/apt-listbugs.docs > > file

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-14 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi, as you see, I am not always quick. Quite the opposite sometimes… sorry. On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > Some "unrelated" remarks still: > > > > > * updated Homepage field in debian/control to point to the new home on > > > salsa.debian.org > > > >

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-05 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:39:48 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > I had thought about doing so, but I could not figure out how to handle > the situation: what information should the LICENSE file contain? > Pretty the same as debian/copyright, I guess. > > If this is indeed the case, then I would

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 19:40:09 + Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2018-11-03 11:11] "Francesco Poli (wintermute)" > > Hello everybody, > > my usual sponsor has some blocking issues and is currently unable to > > upload packages on my behalf. > > > > I prepared a new version of apt-listbugs

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:58:04 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote: > Hi, Hello David, nice to see your reply! :-) > > On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: > > Could someone please build the package from commit > > [999e167ed8a45ce97283977ec534657b90d808fe], >

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-03 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-11-03 11:11] "Francesco Poli (wintermute)" > Hello everybody, > my usual sponsor has some blocking issues and is currently unable to > upload packages on my behalf. > > I prepared a new version of apt-listbugs (0.1.25): it is ready to be > uploaded. > Could someone please build the

Bug#912736: RFS: apt-listbugs/0.1.25

2018-11-03 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello everybody, my usual sponsor has some blocking issues and is currently unable to upload packages on my behalf. I prepared a new version of apt-listbugs (0.1.25): it is ready to be uploaded. Could someone please build the package from commit