[2018-12-02 00:47] Michael Biebl
> I've asked for a C implementation for various reasons (being usable as
> shebang on !linux, being able to set $0).
>
> This was not really addressed in 2.92~beta-1, so reopening accordingly.
C implementation is not purpose by itself. What do you really want?
* You was already provided with a simple way to make scripts work
with kernel != "linux".
* Issue with sysctl forwarding was fixed with several lines of shell
script.
* You claim that there is more shell code, that uses $0. Maybe. File
bug reports. I believe fixes would be several lines too.
Can you please again explain, why do you want us to create and maintain
one more implementation of argv0(1)?
