Bug#914660: entr FTCBFS: builds for the wrong architecture

2019-06-07 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 12:03:59AM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > It looks clean and very sensible to me. Eric was always very keen in > accepting suggestions, if you could create and issue or PR it would > be great, so that we could simply use the upstream source directly. The embedded cross.patch

Bug#914660: entr FTCBFS: builds for the wrong architecture

2019-06-07 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Fri, Jun 07 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > Sorry for the long delay in replying. This one completely slipped under by radar. Thanks Otto for pinging me. > i looked at the patch but I am not sure if I understand it fully. > > Upstream is very responsive so I suggest you send a pull

Bug#914660: entr FTCBFS: builds for the wrong architecture

2019-06-07 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Hello! Sorry for the long delay in replying. i looked at the patch but I am not sure if I understand it fully. Upstream is very responsive so I suggest you send a pull request at https://bitbucket.org/eradman/entr/pull-requests/ for the parts that are upstreamable and for the rest a merge

Bug#914660: entr FTCBFS: builds for the wrong architecture

2018-11-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
Please don't forget to Cc the bug. On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:16:39AM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote: > Hi Helmut, I'm aware of how the configure/Makefile of entr is far from > optimal. However, did you try to send and/or discuss the patch upstream? I did not. At the same time, my implementation is

Bug#914660: entr FTCBFS: builds for the wrong architecture

2018-11-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: entr Version: 4.1-1 Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap entr fails to cross build from source, because it builds for the wrong architecture. Its configure inspects uname output with no way to override it. Therefore, my patch reimplements configure in debian/rules.