Hi Michael,
Michael Biebl ezt írta (időpont: 2018. dec. 9., V, 0:37):
>
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 21:57:11 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?QsOhbGludCBSw6ljemV5?=
> wrote:
> > While I believe securetty should be disabled by default
>
> Fwiw, I agree that securetty is a bad idea and should be removed from
> the defaul
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 21:57:11 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?QsOhbGludCBSw6ljemV5?=
wrote:
> While I believe securetty should be disabled by default
Fwiw, I agree that securetty is a bad idea and should be removed from
the default pam configuration.
There is a login-standing bug report, documenting that securetty
Control: block -1 by 877374
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso ezt írta (időpont: 2018. nov.
29., Cs, 6:11):
>
> Control: fixed -1 1:4.5-1
>
> Hi,
>
> [disclaimer: not the maintainer here]
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:15:18PM +1100, russm wrote:
> > Package: login
> > Version: 1:4.4-4.1
> > Severity: gr
Control: fixed -1 1:4.5-1
Hi,
[disclaimer: not the maintainer here]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:15:18PM +1100, russm wrote:
> Package: login
> Version: 1:4.4-4.1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> The addition of pts/* to /etc/securetty was reverted in 1:4
Package: login
Version: 1:4.4-4.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
The addition of pts/* to /etc/securetty was reverted in 1:4.5-1 but
*not* in packages installed to stretch. Please backport this fix to
1:4.4-*
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.6
APT pref
5 matches
Mail list logo
