On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 02:15:21PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
> thank you for the update, do you think it will make sense to re-upload
> pyscanfcs to trigger rebuild?
There is no need to rebuild since the FTBFS was just on some third
party machine. Just do a local rebuild and if you can c
On 12/30/18 3:58 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> only time for a short notice but that's actually a consequence of
> #917353.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
Hi Andreas,
thank you for the update, do you think it will make sense to re-upload
pyscanfcs to trigger rebuild?
Best,
Alex
Hi,
only time for a short notice but that's actually a consequence of
#917353.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Source: pyscanfcs
Version: 0.3.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/pyscanfcs
4 matches
Mail list logo