Hi,
Jakub Wilk:
> With this one-line implementation of is_apparmor_present(), the script
> seems to work, but I get warnings about missing functions:
>/etc/init.d/apparmor: 209: /etc/init.d/apparmor: aa_log_action_start: not
> found
>/etc/init.d/apparmor: 221: /etc/init.d/apparmor: aa_l
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 13:04:59 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Now I get:
>
> Starting AppArmor - failed, To enable AppArmor, ensure your kernel is
> configured with CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=y then add 'security=apparmor
> apparmor=1' to the kernel command line
That's what I got as well today after
Hello,
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2018, 13:04:59 CET schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> * Christian Boltz , 2018-12-31, 12:22:
> >>The init script is broken. The start action fails with:
> >> /etc/init.d/apparmor: 60: shift: can't shift that many
> >
> >This looks like a regression from upstream commit
> >0d5ab
* Christian Boltz , 2018-12-31, 12:22:
The init script is broken. The start action fails with:
/etc/init.d/apparmor: 60: shift: can't shift that many
This looks like a regression from upstream commit
0d5ab43d592245d011b2614e6e20fc7cb851c53c which got backported into the
Debian package.
Hello,
Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2018, 10:35:58 CET schrieb Jakub Wilk:
> Package: apparmor
> Version: 2.13.2-2
>
> The init script is broken. The start action fails with:
>
>/etc/init.d/apparmor: 60: shift: can't shift that many
This looks like a regression from upstream commit
0d5ab43d59224
Package: apparmor
Version: 2.13.2-2
The init script is broken. The start action fails with:
/etc/init.d/apparmor: 60: shift: can't shift that many
-- System Information:
Architecture: i386
Versions of packages apparmor depends on:
ii debconf 1.5.69
ii lsb-base 10.2018112800
ii p
6 matches
Mail list logo