Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[olga906090]

Dear Lisandro,

almost all my problems were solved by removing/purging all packages from
unstable (only 47 - one of these have to have caused the problem). The
segfaults did not appear again after removing those packages if they do
I'll write again until then that topic is solved on my side. In case you
are still interested I can attach the list with the 47 unstable packages.

These unstable packages were unwillingly installed although I used the
following Pinning options as suggested in the Debian Wiki:
> Package: *
> Pin: release  a=testing
> Pin-Priority: 900
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release o=Debian
> Pin-Priority: -10

This should have prevented installing unstable packages unless
explicitly told but when a package was removed from testing the unstable
equivalent was automatically installed without explicit notice.

Thanks for your work and help!
Maria

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[olga906090]

Dear Lisandro,

I did upgrades. In between the error did not show up in dmesg one or two
times (although the irratic behavior didn't change, so that's possibly
unrelated?!). Now the error is back anyway.

lo is up and running (see attached textfile).

I also attached the output of "debsums" and of "dpkg -V".





Just to be complete about my system here are some additional infos where
I don't know if they are related:

Yesterday I had an additional error which already showed up some time
ago and I don't know what to make of it. This is unusual and I have to
restart:

[Fr Jan  4 14:50:37 2019] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler
[i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
[Fr Jan  4 14:50:37 2019] [drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler
[i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe B FIFO underrun

Regular (possibly related?) errors in dmesg are:

[Sa Jan  5 09:26:03] resource sanity check: requesting [mem
0xfed1-0xfed15fff], which spans more than pnp 00:01 [mem
0xfed1-0xfed13fff]
[Sa Jan  5 09:26:03 2019] caller snb_uncore_imc_init_box+0x6c/0xb0
[intel_uncore] mapping multiple BARs

I filed the following one in a different bug report:
Bug#918196: vboxdrv: module verification failed: signature and/or
required key missing - tainting kernel

And there are some messages concerning ata, acpi and drm but they don't
sound related, I don't know.


Thanks alot!
Maria

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> El miércoles, 2 de enero de 2019 15:03:00 -03 Maria escribió:
>> Dear Lisandro,
>>
>> I don't know if it is related (as my whole KDE is acting weird and slow)
>> or I should rather file a different bug report but I just realised there
>> is another segfault (SessionThread/libQt5Core) an hour after the
>> baloo_file_extr/libc-2.28.so segfault:
> 
> [snip]
>  
>> Could this be related to the ongoing transitions which are mentioned in
>> the IRC? 
> 
> No one else has reported such a bug, so let me recommend you to:
> 
> - check that your loopback interface (lo) is up and running.
> - run debsums 
> - check your hardware.
> 
> You cal also try upgrading your system, Qt has just migrated (you might need 
> to wait for it to get to your mirror).
> 
> Cheers, Lisandro.
> 

# ifconfig
lo: flags=73  mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10
loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Lokale Schleife)
RX packets 318  bytes 23512 (22.9 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 318  bytes 23512 (22.9 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

# dpkg -V
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/allow-arp.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/allow-dhcp-server.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/allow-dhcp.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/allow-incoming-ipv4.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/allow-ipv4.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/clean-traffic-gateway.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/clean-traffic.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-arp-ip-spoofing.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-arp-mac-spoofing.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-arp-spoofing.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-ip-multicast.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-ip-spoofing.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-mac-broadcast.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-mac-spoofing.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-other-l2-traffic.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/no-other-rarp-traffic.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/qemu-announce-self-rarp.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/nwfilter/qemu-announce-self.xml
??5?? c /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml
??5?? c /etc/bash.bashrc
??5?? c /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
??5?? c /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/compat/caps
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/compat/level5
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/compat/misc
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base.xml
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/evdev.xml
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/de
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/level3
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/level5
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/shift
??5??   /usr/share/X11/xkb/types/level5
??5??   /usr/share/doc/libtelepathy-qt4-2/changelog.Debian.gz
??5?? c /etc/xdg/autostart/kmix_autostart.desktop
??5?? c /etc/xdg/autostart/restore_kmix_volumes.desktop
??5?? c /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
??5?? c /etc/xdg/kldap.renamecategories
??5?? c /etc/default/mysql
??5?? c /etc/init.d/mysql
??5?? c /etc/logrotate.d/mysql-server
??5?? c /etc/mysql/debian-start
??5?? c /etc/mysql/mariadb.conf.d/50-mysqld_safe.cnf
??5?? c /etc/mysql/mariadb.conf.d/50-server.cnf
??5?? c /etc/default/tlp
??5?? c /etc/xdg/kalarmcal.categories

# debsums -a -s
debsums: changed file /etc/bash.bashrc (from bash package)

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

El miércoles, 2 de enero de 2019 15:03:00 -03 Maria escribió:
> Dear Lisandro,
> 
> I don't know if it is related (as my whole KDE is acting weird and slow)
> or I should rather file a different bug report but I just realised there
> is another segfault (SessionThread/libQt5Core) an hour after the
> baloo_file_extr/libc-2.28.so segfault:

[snip]
 
> Could this be related to the ongoing transitions which are mentioned in
> the IRC? 

No one else has reported such a bug, so let me recommend you to:

- check that your loopback interface (lo) is up and running.
- run debsums 
- check your hardware.

You cal also try upgrading your system, Qt has just migrated (you might need 
to wait for it to get to your mirror).

Cheers, Lisandro.

-- 
Why should I care about my chatter from yesterday?
Nothing prevents me from becoming wiser.
  Konrad Adenauer, former German chancellor.
  http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/397422/60a270d48f933c67/

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Maria]

Dear Lisandro,

I don't know if it is related (as my whole KDE is acting weird and slow)
or I should rather file a different bug report but I just realised there
is another segfault (SessionThread/libQt5Core) an hour after the
baloo_file_extr/libc-2.28.so segfault:

[16:20:42] baloo_file_extr[2509]: segfault at 7f49f1e87630 ip
7f49f1977bbb sp 7ffe3a2f4bf8 error 7 in
libc-2.28.so[7f49f183d000+148000]

[16:20:42] Code: 0c 16 4c 39 cf 0f 82 c5 01 00 00 48 89 d1 f3 a4 c3 80
fa 10 73 17 80 fa 08 73 27 80 fa 04 73 33 80 fa 01 77 3b 72 05 0f b6 0e
<88> 0f c3 c5 fa 6f 06 c5 fa 6f 4c 16 f0 c5 fa 7f 07 c5 fa 7f 4c 17


[17:29:37] SessionThread[4492]: segfault at 78 ip 7fbd30896be4 sp
7fbd06ffc448 error 4 in libQt5Core.so.5.11.2[7fbd30676000+2a3000]

[17:29:37] Code: 41 5e c3 e8 ae f8 dd ff e9 9a 56 df ff 48 89 c3 e9 d8
56 df ff 90 48 8b 47 08 48 8b 40 70 c3 90 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 8b 47 08
<8b> 40 78 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 47 08 0f b6 40 7c c3 9


Could this be related to the ongoing transitions which are mentioned in
the IRC? 

Thanks for your time!
Maria


Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> Ok, so it's not the bug I was expecting

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

El mié., 2 ene. 2019 10:11, Maria 
escribió:

> Dear Lisandro,
>
> my systemd version is 240-2 (amd64).


Ok, so it's not the bug I was expecting

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Maria]

Dear Lisandro,

my systemd version is 240-2 (amd64).

Thanks - Maria


Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> dpkg -l systemd

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

Hi Maria!

El mar., 1 ene. 2019 10:51, Maria 
escribió:

> Package: baloo-kf5
> Version: 5.51.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> after dist-upgrade today I get the following error message in dmesg:
> > baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault at 557db49eb9c0 ip 7f2dc3164d74 sp
> 7ffdf9080a98 error 4 in libc-2.28.so[7f2dc302a000+148000]
>
> If I can provide more info please tell me what you need and how I can get
> it.
>
> After this dist-upgrade I got alot of problems which might or might not be
> related:
> * startup takes several minutes (before it was just a matter of seconds)
> * takes 10 to 20 seconds until the login screen is shown (while mouse on
> blackscreen is working)


Which version of systemd does your system have? Use

dpkg -l systemd

to get the info.

Bug#917950: baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault

[Maria]

Package: baloo-kf5
Version: 5.51.0-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

after dist-upgrade today I get the following error message in dmesg:
> baloo_file_extr[2787]: segfault at 557db49eb9c0 ip 7f2dc3164d74 sp
7ffdf9080a98 error 4 in libc-2.28.so[7f2dc302a000+148000]

If I can provide more info please tell me what you need and how I can get it.

After this dist-upgrade I got alot of problems which might or might not be
related:
* startup takes several minutes (before it was just a matter of seconds)
* takes 10 to 20 seconds until the login screen is shown (while mouse on
blackscreen is working)
* taskbars of Plasma take quite some seconds to load until they appear (after
background and automaticly started software is already running)
* initial change of activity also takes a long time
* sound is not working at all

Here is my output of "dmesg -T"

[12:51:23] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0xc6, date =
2018-04-17
[12:51:23] Linux version 4.19.0-1-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc
version 8.2.0 (Debian 8.2.0-13)) #1 SMP Debian 4.19.12-1 (2018-12-22)
[12:51:23] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.19.0-1-amd64
root=/dev/mapper/name-vg-root ro quiet intel_iommu=igfx_off
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x001: 'x87 floating point
registers'
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x002: 'SSE registers'
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x004: 'AVX registers'
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x008: 'MPX bounds registers'
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Supporting XSAVE feature 0x010: 'MPX CSR'
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[2]:  576, xstate_sizes[2]:  256
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[3]:  832, xstate_sizes[3]:   64
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[4]:  896, xstate_sizes[4]:   64
[12:51:23] x86/fpu: Enabled xstate features 0x1f, context size is 960 bytes,
using 'compacted' format.
[12:51:23] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x-0x00057fff] usable
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00058000-0x00058fff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00059000-0x0008bfff] usable
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0008c000-0x000f] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0010-0xaff9bfff] usable
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xaff9c000-0xaff9cfff] ACPI NVS
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xaff9d000-0xaffc6fff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xaffc7000-0xb98c9fff] usable
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xb98ca000-0xb9907fff] type 20
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xb9908000-0xbb47bfff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xbb47c000-0xbb4cbfff] ACPI NVS
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xbb4cc000-0xbb4fefff] ACPI data
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xbb4ff000-0xbb4f] usable
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xbb50-0xbf7f] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xf80fa000-0xf80fafff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xf80fd000-0xf80fdfff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0xfe00-0xfe010fff] reserved
[12:51:23] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0001-0x00043e7f] usable
[12:51:23] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
[12:51:23] efi: EFI v2.40 by Lenovo
[12:51:23] efi:  SMBIOS=0xbb104000  ACPI=0xbb4fe000  ACPI 2.0=0xbb4fe014
MPS=0xbb425000  ESRT=0xba1a5000
[12:51:23] secureboot: Secure boot could not be determined (mode 0)
[12:51:23] SMBIOS 2.8 present.
[12:51:23] DMI: LENOVO 20FJS03700/20FJS03700, BIOS N1KET16W (1.03 ) 01/20/2016
[12:51:23] tsc: Detected 2400.000 MHz processor
[12:51:23] e820: update [mem 0x-0x0fff] usable ==> reserved
[12:51:23] e820: remove [mem 0x000a-0x000f] usable
[12:51:23] last_pfn = 0x43e800 max_arch_pfn = 0x4
[12:51:23] MTRR default type: write-back
[12:51:23] MTRR fixed ranges enabled:
[12:51:23]   0-9 write-back
[12:51:23]   A-B uncachable
[12:51:23]   C-F write-protect
[12:51:23] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
[12:51:23]   0 base 00C000 mask 7FC000 uncachable
[12:51:23]   1 base 00BE00 mask 7FFE00 uncachable
[12:51:23]   2 base 00BD00 mask 7FFF00 uncachable
[12:51:23]   3 disabled
[12:51:23]   4 disabled
[12:51:23]   5 disabled
[12:51:23]   6 disabled
[12:51:23]   7 disabled
[12:51:23]   8 disabled
[12:51:23]   9 disabled
[12:51:23] x86/PAT: Configuration [0-7]: WB  WC  UC- UC  WB  WP  UC- WT
[12:51:23] last_pfn = 0xbb500 max_arch_pfn = 0x4
[12:51:23] esrt: Reserving ESRT space from 0xba1a5000 to
0xba1a5060.
[12:51:23] Base memory trampoline at [(ptrval)] 6 size 24576
[12:51:23] Using GB pages for direct mapping
[12:51:23] BRK [0x182a01000, 0x182a01fff] PGTABLE
[12:51:23] BRK [0x182a02000, 0x182a02fff] PGTABLE
[12:51:23] BRK [0x182a03000, 0x182a03fff] PGTABLE
[12:51:23] BRK [0x182a04000, 0x182a04fff] PGTABLE
[12:51:23] BRK