On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 21:27:31 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Is there any reason why we're using RLimitNPROC instead of setting
> > MaxClients?
> >
> MaxRequestWorkers (new name for MaxClients) is set to 150 currently. We
> could try lowering that
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 21:27:31 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > the last few days our two bugs web hosts have been struggling. We've
> > got apache set up with RLimitNPROC 256, which means once www-data has
> > that many processes fork() dies with
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Julien Cristau wrote:
> the last few days our two bugs web hosts have been struggling. We've
> got apache set up with RLimitNPROC 256, which means once www-data has
> that many processes fork() dies with EAGAIN.
>
> In the case of version.cgi that means perl forking to run
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ad...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
the last few days our two bugs web hosts have been struggling. We've
got apache set up with RLimitNPROC 256, which means once www-data has
that many processes fork() dies with EAGAIN.
In the case of
4 matches
Mail list logo
