Ok. I give up. Do what you like. It's not important.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSH
"OpenSSH (also known as OpenBSD Secure Shell) ..."
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:37:10PM +0900, IKEDA Shigeru wrote:
> OpenSSH is not short hand or something for "OpenBSD secure shell", and
> that sentence in README file doesn't say that too.
I didn't claim that OpenSSH was a shorthand for it, merely that it was a
reasonably accurate description.
>
If you guys really want to include the word 'OpenBSD', here is alternate patch.
--- openssh-server.ssh.init 2019-02-09 01:26:35.0 +0900
+++ openssh-server.ssh.init.corrected 2019-02-26 19:40:38.742657219 +0900
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
# Required-Stop: $remote_fs $syslog
# Default-Start: 2
OpenSSH is not short hand or something for "OpenBSD secure shell", and
that sentence in README file doesn't say that too.
OpenSSH is just OpenSSH. Why can't we call it just OpenSSH?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 7:36 PM Colin Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:48:55PM +0900, Hocus Pocus
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:48:55PM +0900, Hocus Pocus wrote:
> OpenSSH is not "OpenBSD Secure Shell". That's it.
In what sense is it not? I mean, OpenSSH's README file says:
This is the port of OpenBSD's excellent OpenSSH[0] to Linux and other
Unices.
--
Colin Watson
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:7.7p1-4ubuntu0.2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
OpenSSH is not "OpenBSD Secure Shell". That's it.
So /etc/init.d/ssh should changed.
Here is the patch.
--- openssh-server.ssh.init 2019-02-09 01:26:35.0 +0900
+++ openssh-server.ssh.init.new
6 matches
Mail list logo