Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
Package: alpine Version: 2.24+dfsg1-1 Followup-For: Bug #923481 X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de This bug still persists. This caused loss of connection between a mailing list thread and a debbugs entry. This is becoming really annoying. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages alpine depends on: ii libc6 2.31-5 ii libcrypt1 1:4.4.17-1 ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.18.3-4 ii libkrb5-3 1.18.3-4 ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.56+dfsg-1 ii libssl1.1 1.1.1h-1 ii libtinfo6 6.2+20201114-1 ii mlock 8:2007f~dfsg-7+b1 Versions of packages alpine recommends: pn alpine-doc ii sensible-utils 0.0.12+nmu1 Versions of packages alpine suggests: ii aspell 0.60.8-1 ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 3.5.6-1 -- no debconf information
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Control: severity -1 important Howdy, On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote: On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Unit 193 wrote: Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it seems it preserved those fields as expected. I am using alpine 2.21. Please try this, from the original submission: I've confirmed this does indeed remove them. If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject line, press ^K to remove the existing (possibly damaged) text and type new text (possibly to change the subthread subject), the eMail When just replying to a message without changing Subject, alpine indeed keeps the headers just fine. Given that it normally leaves the headers intact, and that the email client is still entirely usable even if you do hit this bug, I'm lowering the severity as it most certainly isn't RC worthy. ~Unit 193 Unit193 @ freenode Unit193 @ OFTC -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCQAGBQJdaZjPAAoJEFAB4bCao3RLlewP/i0i1bFwjq+ApIDXE8vI3rRe SqYn35l+v3o/RENmHIBJ+9DkJaRLkwwWr003Aeiup+/WdPzFV3QwWZDMoUQe9gu6 TwKwlIoA6dBscN448oUTK803B5uzRtOfFG0RVwes4EQD2qyh6BfyzlSrUtxEUWNB /SCenJ97B5pwH1NDMvgstVqctGlLrGXzGaiNbUxyWCYn2ZsJ2ovi8No5pOsvuOLV qHz4wxCa6VgYBdIVqUkVfZheihjQbZQ1I53X0+CvfyCB3KE41pb4NLANd06t+YAd m6Ygnu3SNk5ZN4+tcF0d7i3N0BH7zCqRGAQ/U2KjBcfDuMOndjUvNnk39/RZFkAA 4S4JqSaEgc8guuXzjJt6xg4hkAx8YGDJye1+l8D2vcs6hhhVYmeywMAQmV+m2vh3 x0WO3LLW8VJJPGjPCl9kYYNXv50+9Iq3YR/kIWtXrQ6sqWHST7grqnzFoY3/aWRm 6+vmKgUO1u4n/BOGv9tyAlTvqpe1lCzmbras8uy9x1qCxFtof2PC0OFLMg5Ro3vO Yj8026GBBTk26BzRExrToBjGMFazASTHMZsfftaCpEIF/AREmqui7QQkW2DnFfr6 7zrW4ysB+Gw63kMUFcRhpuFzZY4obpFINAEjuUCR3obPegc4X/UMsRi/eXnSfEta IYWC8wh3OJLVyINQMJrL =+IvI -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Unit 193 wrote: > Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it > seems it preserved those fields as expected. I am using alpine 2.21. Please try this, from the original submission: If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject line, press ^K to remove the existing (possibly damaged) text and type new text (possibly to change the subthread subject), the eMail When just replying to a message without changing Subject, alpine indeed keeps the headers just fine. bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg ** Mit der tarent Academy bieten wir auch Trainings und Schulungen in den Bereichen Softwareentwicklung, Agiles Arbeiten und Zukunftstechnologien an. Besuchen Sie uns auf www.tarent.de/academy. Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Kontakt. **
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
Howdy, On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Thorsten Glaser wrote: severity 923481 serious thanks (Please remember to Cc the bug submitter when replying.) On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Unit 193 wrote: As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a difference in how pine and alpine function, correct? No, this is definitively a serious loss of functionality, namely, message threading (which is expected to work correctly in contemporary MUAs excepting those from Redmond). Ah right. Though while looking through several of my recent sent items, it seems it preserved those fields as expected. I am using alpine 2.21. It seems I am unable to reproduce the results you're getting? ~Unit 193 Unit193 @ freenode Unit193 @ OFTC
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
severity 923481 serious thanks (Please remember to Cc the bug submitter when replying.) On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Unit 193 wrote: > As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a > difference in how pine and alpine function, correct? No, this is definitively a serious loss of functionality, namely, message threading (which is expected to work correctly in contemporary MUAs excepting those from Redmond). bye, //mirabilos -- tarent solutions GmbH Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/ Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235 HRB 5168 (AG Bonn) • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg ** Mit der tarent Academy bieten wir auch Trainings und Schulungen in den Bereichen Softwareentwicklung, Agiles Arbeiten und Zukunftstechnologien an. Besuchen Sie uns auf www.tarent.de/academy. Wir freuen uns auf Ihren Kontakt. **
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
Howdy, As I understand it, this is not a regression in alpine but a difference in how pine and alpine function, correct? ~Unit 193 Unit193 @ freenode Unit193 @ OFTC
Bug#923481: alpine: replies lose In-Reply-To and References headers
Package: alpine Version: 2.21+dfsg1-1.1 Severity: serious If I take a message, reply to it, then go to the Subject line, press ^K to remove the existing (possibly damaged) text and type new text (possibly to change the subthread subject), the eMail gets sent out AND Fcc’d without both In-Reply-To and References headers, completely and utterly breaking threading. This is a major regression relative to pine 4.64 which does emit these headers in that exact case (as just checked by me). -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers buildd-unstable APT policy: (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages alpine depends on: ii libc6 2.28-7 ii libgssapi-krb5-2 1.17-2 ii libkrb5-3 1.17-2 ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.47+dfsg-3 ii libpam0g 1.3.1-5 ii libssl1.1 1.1.1b-1 ii libtinfo6 6.1+20181013-2 ii mlock 8:2007f~dfsg-6 Versions of packages alpine recommends: pn alpine-doc Versions of packages alpine suggests: ii aspell 0.60.7~20110707-6 ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 3.3.2-4 -- no debconf information
