Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2023-07-18 Thread David Bremner
Bastien  writes:

> Hi Nicholas,
>
> thanks for your answer.
>
> Nicholas D Steeves  writes:
>
>> Thank you for the notification, and sorry for the unfortunate state of
>> Org mode in Debian 12 (bookworm).  A variety of factors intersected to
>> generate this outcome, and I wish we, as a team, had been able to do
>> better.
>
> No problem at all.  While I'm at it: any idea on how many persons are
> using the Debian Org package? I suspect there are less and less users,
> because Org comes with Emacs and is easily installable as an Emacs
> package, but perhaps I'm wrong.
>

In the end the state of org-mode in bookworm is fine: users get the
version from emacs as the separate elpa-org package is a dummy package.

It is hard to know what popcon numbers mean in absolute terms, but the
number of installs is overall trending upward:

   
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=elpa-org_installed=on_legend=on_ticks=on_fmt=%25Y-%25m=1

The question whether it is worth packaging org in Debian is essentially
the same as for any other package in GNU ELPA. Some users prefer a more
"upstream" approach as it generally gives newer software, while others
find value in the integration and testing provided by Debian.



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2023-07-18 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicholas,

thanks for your answer.

Nicholas D Steeves  writes:

> Thank you for the notification, and sorry for the unfortunate state of
> Org mode in Debian 12 (bookworm).  A variety of factors intersected to
> generate this outcome, and I wish we, as a team, had been able to do
> better.

No problem at all.  While I'm at it: any idea on how many persons are
using the Debian Org package? I suspect there are less and less users,
because Org comes with Emacs and is easily installable as an Emacs
package, but perhaps I'm wrong.

> Do you think that org-contrib should be installed alongside Org by
> default?

Not anymore.  When org-contrib was very new, yes, this would have been
a good idea to smooth the transition for some users.

> I believe in
> "better late than never", so would like to fix these issues for Debian
> 13 (trixie), as well as for users who will manually install the latest
> available Debian org-mode package onto older releases.

I don't think the issue needs to be fixed anymore, unless there are
many bug reports against org-contrib (or some library in org-contrib)
missing.

> Also, is there something we should consider automatically parsing for
> notice of these kinds of changes?

Not anymore.

Regards,

-- 
 Bastien



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2023-07-05 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2023-07-05 18:04:46, Nicholas D. Steeves wrote:

[...]

> Bastien  writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is the right place to announce this, but here it
>> goes: Org 9.4 is out.
>
> That's a good question!  Yes, I believe that filing a "new upstream
> version" bug is likely to reduce the latency between when you release,
> and when this release is imported into Debian.  With a Debian system,
> this is achieved with the following command:
>
>   reportbug org-mode

I do not believe it is necessary to open a new "new upstream release"
bug report, we have this one, it can just be retitled.

a.
-- 
L'adversaire d'une vraie liberté est un désir excessif de sécurité.
- Jean de la Fontaine



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2023-07-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Bastien,

Reply follows inline.

Bastien  writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure if this is the right place to announce this, but here it
> goes: Org 9.4 is out.

That's a good question!  Yes, I believe that filing a "new upstream
version" bug is likely to reduce the latency between when you release,
and when this release is imported into Debian.  With a Debian system,
this is achieved with the following command:

  reportbug org-mode

> We plan to remove the contrib/ directory from org-mode.git for either
> Org 9.5 or Org 9.6.
>
> We will provide another way to install contribs, surely as a Org ELPA
> package.  I will let you know the details.

Thank you for the notification, and sorry for the unfortunate state of
Org mode in Debian 12 (bookworm).  A variety of factors intersected to
generate this outcome, and I wish we, as a team, had been able to do
better.

As for dependency packages that ensure a smooth transition: For Debian
12 (bookworm), unfortunately neither org-drill nor org-contrib are
installed by default when org-mode is installed.  I believe org-drill
should have been, but I'm not sure sure about org-contrib, given its
status as a kind of unmaintained orphanage area.  Do you think that
org-contrib should be installed alongside Org by default?  I believe in
"better late than never", so would like to fix these issues for Debian
13 (trixie), as well as for users who will manually install the latest
available Debian org-mode package onto older releases.

Also, is there something we should consider automatically parsing for
notice of these kinds of changes?

Regards,
Nicholas



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2023-07-05 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi,

Sebastien Delafond  writes:

> On 15/03 22:45, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>> While triaging bugs I just noticed this one is marked fixed but is
>> still open.  Was it left open as a reminder to backport bullseye's
>> org-mode?
>
> I believe that was the rationale at the time.
>
>> Does arch:all elpa-org-mode need a formal bpo, or will adding testing
>> or sid apt source in combination with pinning work well enough?
>
> Package pinning should work fine, but if enough users request a proper
> stable backport I guess it could also be maintained.

Bookworm has been released, which means bullseye-backports will probably
be winding down in a year.  Meanwhile, no one requested an org-mode
formal backport in three years, so I think it's safe to close this bug.

Regards,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2020-09-23 Thread Bastien
Hi all,

I'm not sure if this is the right place to announce this, but here it
goes: Org 9.4 is out.

We plan to remove the contrib/ directory from org-mode.git for either
Org 9.5 or Org 9.6.

We will provide another way to install contribs, surely as a Org ELPA
package.  I will let you know the details.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2020-03-16 Thread Sebastien Delafond
On 15/03 22:45, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> While triaging bugs I just noticed this one is marked fixed but is
> still open.  Was it left open as a reminder to backport bullseye's
> org-mode?

I believe that was the rationale at the time.

> Does arch:all elpa-org-mode need a formal bpo, or will adding testing
> or sid apt source in combination with pinning work well enough?

Package pinning should work fine, but if enough users request a proper
stable backport I guess it could also be maintained.

Cheers,

-- 
Seb



Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2020-03-15 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Antoine and Sébastien!

On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:27:08PM -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> Package: org-mode
> Version: 9.1.14+dfsg-3
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> It would be great to see the newest version of org-mode packaged in
> Debian. I understand it's too late to pass the freeze, but maybe it
> could be uploaded to experimental in the meantime and eventually
> backported to buster?
> 

While triaging bugs I just noticed this one is marked fixed but is
still open.  Was it left open as a reminder to backport bullseye's
org-mode?  Does arch:all elpa-org-mode need a formal bpo, or will
adding testing or sid apt source in combination with pinning work well
enough?

Cheers,
Nicholas


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#923908: new upstream version available (9.2)

2019-03-06 Thread Antoine Beaupre
Package: org-mode
Version: 9.1.14+dfsg-3
Severity: wishlist

It would be great to see the newest version of org-mode packaged in
Debian. I understand it's too late to pass the freeze, but maybe it
could be uploaded to experimental in the meantime and eventually
backported to buster?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages org-mode depends on:
ii  elpa-org  9.1.14+dfsg-3

org-mode recommends no packages.

org-mode suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed