Bug#924554: Bug#928108: Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-27 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Bálint, On 27-05-2019 22:53, Bálint Réczey wrote: > The funny thing is that when Buster becomes stable and security > updates start flowing the autopkgtest will pass again. Would the test start failing again around the bullseye release period? > I can upload them if you would like to see

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-27 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 23., Cs, 8:59): > > Hi Bálint, > > On 22-05-2019 17:07, Bálint Réczey wrote: > >> Please remove the moreinfo tag when the package built successfully. > > > > Done, with the version number adjusted. The failing autopkgtest is not > > related to

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-26 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Bálint, On 23-05-2019 08:59, Paul Gevers wrote: > Unblocked, thanks. However, can you explain why the autopkgtests started > failing and do you expect it to keep failing? If the fix is obvious and > easily and only in the debian/tests/ directory, I'd like to have it, > such that the

Bug#928108: Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-23 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Bálint, On 22-05-2019 17:07, Bálint Réczey wrote: >> Please remove the moreinfo tag when the package built successfully. > > Done, with the version number adjusted. The failing autopkgtest is not > related to this change. Unblocked, thanks. However, can you explain why the autopkgtests

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-22 Thread Bálint Réczey
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.11.1 Hi Paul, Paul Gevers ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 21., K, 21:06): > > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > Hi Bálint, > > On 21-05-2019 09:58, Bálint Réczey wrote: ... > > Please find the the patch attached

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Hi Bálint, On 21-05-2019 09:58, Bálint Réczey wrote: > OK, I understand. I hoped Release Team could take a look at the > referenced bugs and list the ones they would see important enough to > include in Buster. IMO letting 1.12 in would come with the least >

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-21 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers ezt írta (időpont: 2019. máj. 20., H, 20:38): > > Hi Jan, Bálint, > > On 20-05-2019 09:02, Jan Wagner wrote: > > Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner: > >>>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded > >> or removed > >>> (LP: #1821103)

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-20 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jan, Bálint, On 20-05-2019 09:02, Jan Wagner wrote: > Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner: >>>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded >> or removed >>> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554) >> I'm still considering this as a regression and thus RC. > > DO we

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-20 Thread Jan Wagner
Dear release team, Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner: >>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded > or removed >> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554) > I'm still considering this as a regression and thus RC. DO we need to change severity to RC to get that

Bug#924554: Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

2019-05-12 Thread Jan Wagner
Dear Release Team, Am 28.04.19 um 12:57 schrieb Bálint Réczey: > Unattended-upgrades 1.12 contains almost only fixes for bugs holding > back security updates or for regressions. > I'm wondering if you would let it in Buster in full or just with > omitting parts of the fixes. If omitting some of