On Mon, Apr 22, 17:30, Andre Noll wrote
> > But in general, the package already seems to be in a releasable state.
> > Could you please change "UNRELEASED" to "unstable" so it can be uploaded?
>
> Done. Please have a final look. If everything is fine, I can merge
> the various topic branches to m
On Sun, Apr 21, 22:25, Adam Borowski wrote
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> > That's just because I misread section 8.1 of the Debian Policy Manual.
> > I've renamed the -dev package to liblopsub-dev.
>
> Not sure if you'd want the _source_ package to have a simple s
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 05:11:05PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> That's just because I misread section 8.1 of the Debian Policy Manual.
> I've renamed the -dev package to liblopsub-dev.
Not sure if you'd want the _source_ package to have a simple soname-less
name as well; I would but that's up to you
On Sun, Apr 14, 15:41, Adam Borowski wrote
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 09:52:53PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> > > > I see a static library installed by the package. Those shouldn't
> > > > generally
> > > > be used unless you're doing something special -- static linking makes
> > > > security and b
(Sorry for slow response time.)
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 09:52:53PM +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> > > I see a static library installed by the package. Those shouldn't
> > > generally
> > > be used unless you're doing something special -- static linking makes
> > > security and bugfix updates extreme
On Sat, Apr 06, 21:52, Andre Noll wrote
> On Mon, Apr 01, 00:57, Andre Noll wrote
>
> > > I see a static library installed by the package. Those shouldn't
> > > generally
> > > be used unless you're doing something special -- static linking makes
> > > security and bugfix updates extremely tedio
On Mon, Apr 01, 00:57, Andre Noll wrote
> > I see a static library installed by the package. Those shouldn't generally
> > be used unless you're doing something special -- static linking makes
> > security and bugfix updates extremely tedious. Libraries should also be
> > split into separate bin
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:57:51AM +0200, Andre Noll wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 23:58, Adam Borowski wrote
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> > > * Package name: lopsub
> > >Version : 1.0.2
> > This library is certainly not something for Debian only, t
On Sat, Mar 30, 23:58, Adam Borowski wrote
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> > * Package name: lopsub
> >Version : 1.0.2
>
> Such a version means a native package; only software written specifically
> for Debian which makes no sense outside it should
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Andre Noll wrote:
> * Package name: lopsub
>Version : 1.0.2
Such a version means a native package; only software written specifically
for Debian which makes no sense outside it should use the native format.
Even if you're both upstream and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lopsub":
* Package name: lopsub
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Andre Noll
* URL : http://people.tuebingen.mpg.de/maan/lopsub/
* License : (L)GPLv
11 matches
Mail list logo
