Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I've made an initial step of taking my patch from:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> >
> > … and submitting it as a MR on salsa here:
> >
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/13
Alas, this didn't seem to land in th
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I've made an initial step of taking my patch from:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> >
> > … and submitting it as a MR on salsa here:
> >
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/13
>
> May I make a gentle request to ge
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > My current plan is (1) breathing a little, (2) getting the needed
> > > bugfixes into 10.1.
> >
> > Whoops, I'm afraid I totally neglected to followup on this so I
> > apologise this got stalled. Anyway, anything I can do to help?
>
> I've made an initial step of taking my
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> > >
> > > :)
> >
> > My current plan is (1) breathing a little, (2) getting the needed
[trimming CCs to just the mailing lists and #926242]
Hey all,
> > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> >
> > :)
>
> My current plan is (1) breathing a li
Chris Lamb (2019-07-08):
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > In light of that (and whilst my shell is a little rusty) but how about
> > we just make this all more explicit instead of abusing sed/awk?
> >
> > For example:
>
> […]
>
> So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> w
Hi Holger,
> > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
[…]
> https://bugs.debian.org/926242#117 makes me think this is not to be
> applied against jenkins.debian.net.git?
Pre-buster, perhaps? I don't quite se
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:47:34AM -0300, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> […]
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#117 makes me think this is not to be
> > applied against jenk
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:27:02AM -0300, Chris Lamb wrote:
> So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
https://bugs.debian.org/926242#117 makes me think this is not to be
ap
Chris Lamb wrote:
> In light of that (and whilst my shell is a little rusty) but how about
> we just make this all more explicit instead of abusing sed/awk?
>
> For example:
[…]
So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
was thus wondering whether we could apply my patc
10 matches
Mail list logo
