Hi,
Am 15.04.19 um 04:08 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:46:33 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> Thoughts?
>
> There is a better option for this:
>
> Keep the one package but install a different manifest.json into the
> Firefox and Chrome extension directories. This should work
On Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:46:33 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Upstream maintains the webext version of uBo because we asked him to
> do that. I assume it was to simplify the Debian packaging, creating
> one package that works for both browsers. This is obviously extra work
> for upstream. Now we
On Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:46:33 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Thoughts?
There is a better option for this:
Keep the one package but install a different manifest.json into the
Firefox and Chrome extension directories. This should work since
Firefox and Chrome look for their extensions in different
Source: ublock-origin
Version: 1.18.4+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
adding Sean to CC, perhaps he has some ideas too as the previous
maintainer.
Hi,
I was asked by upstream if we could package uBo for Firefox and
Chromium in separate packages again. The reasoning is that we had
recently two severe
4 matches
Mail list logo
