Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-06-24 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
X-Debbugs-CC: bir...@rantanplan.org, ja...@ivyleav.es
Control: forcemerge -1 930898

Hi Birger !

Thanks for your interest in getting conmon packaged.  :)

Jamie (in CC) and myself are also interested in seeing it land in Debian, as
it's a dependency of podman (that we are packaging), and started working on this
under podman-team on Salsa.

I uploaded (our version of) conmon/0.3.0-1 2 days ago, and it's currently in
the NEW review queue.


Sorry for missing your ITP (and some related ones): it seems like wnpp.d.n is
currently broken, it doesn't list results when searching for conmon or other
packages with recent ITPs...

As a result, I opened my own (#930898) but this mail should merge it back with
yours.


In any case, I would love to join efforts with you, and I will send you an
invite to podman-team. I would add you as a co-uploader on the package, help you
with reviews and sponsored uploads, and (if you want) work with you towards
becoming a DM (or a DD) so you can maintain the package independently.


Best,

  nicoo



On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 10:10:00AM +0200, Birger Schacht wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Birger Schacht 
> 
> * Package name: conmon
>   Version : 0.2.0
>   Upstream Author : Peter Hunt
> * URL : https://github.com/containers/conmon
> * License : Apache-2.0
>   Programming Lang: C
>   Description : An OCI container runtime monitor.
> 
> Conmon is a monitoring program and communication tool between a
> container manager (like podman or CRI-O) and an OCI runtime (like runc
> or crun) for a single container.
> It is a run dependency for podman.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-06-16 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi Reinhard,

On 6/1/19 5:17 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I think think that separation is not helping me at all, and I'd really
> prefer the standard layout that gbp-buildpackage suggests:
> http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.intro.html#gbp.repository
> Note that the 'upstream' branch regularily gets merged into the packaging
> branch. This seems to be different with your packaging style. merging the
> upstream sources enables using tools such as license-reconcile, dgit, and
> similar.
> Thanks for your understanding.

I've now merged the upstream tag into master. There was also a new
release a couple of days ago fixing the copyright issue, and I've
updated the package accordingly.

cheers,
Birger



Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-06-01 Thread Reinhard Tartler
I think think that separation is not helping me at all, and I'd really
prefer the standard layout that gbp-buildpackage suggests:
http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.intro.html#gbp.repository
Note that the 'upstream' branch regularily gets merged into the packaging
branch. This seems to be different with your packaging style. merging the
upstream sources enables using tools such as license-reconcile, dgit, and
similar.
Thanks for your understanding.

On Thu, May 30, 2019, 06:14 Birger Schacht  wrote:.

>
> Other than that there is only
> https://github.com/containers/conmon/issues/30 that keeps the package
> from being uploaded.
>
> Yeah, that's an issue. Let's hope upstream reacts on that soon.

Best,
-rt


Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-05-30 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi Reinhard,

On 5/29/19 3:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 2:18 PM Birger Schacht 
> wrote:
>> I maintain the source package on
>> https://salsa.debian.org/bisco-guest/conmon - but conmon is not a golang
>> project, it is C. But if there is another team that package fits, I'd be
>> happy to team maintain ;)
>>
> 
> Thanks for the clarification.
> 
> I notice that you chose a packaging style that does not include
> the upstream sources, which is not my personal preference.
Actually the current upstream source is in the upstream/0.2.0 tag- gbp
buildpackage looks there for the upstream sources.
Is it not possible to use dgit with having upstream sources in a
separate branch?

> Any chance to convince you to use a style that makes it possible
> to use dgit(1)? If so, I'd be happy to help you with moving this
> package to the "debian" namespace (formerly known as collab-maint)
> which provides access to a audience and thus makes collaboration
> easier, and to sponsor uploads as necessary.
Well, I  like having the upstream sources and the debian/ directory
separated from another, but if it makes it easier for you I can merge
the upstream/0.2.0 tag into master.

Other than that there is only
https://github.com/containers/conmon/issues/30 that keeps the package
from being uploaded.

cheers,
Birger



Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-05-29 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 2:18 PM Birger Schacht 
wrote:

> On 5/28/19 6:49 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Thanks for working on this package.
> >
> > Do you plan to have this package team maintained in the golang team? If
> so,
> > please let us know where on salsa you maintain the source package. I may
> be
> > able to help out.
>
> I maintain the source package on
> https://salsa.debian.org/bisco-guest/conmon - but conmon is not a golang
> project, it is C. But if there is another team that package fits, I'd be
> happy to team maintain ;)
>

Thanks for the clarification.

I notice that you chose a packaging style that does not include
the upstream sources, which is not my personal preference.

Any chance to convince you to use a style that makes it possible
to use dgit(1)? If so, I'd be happy to help you with moving this
package to the "debian" namespace (formerly known as collab-maint)
which provides access to a audience and thus makes collaboration
easier, and to sponsor uploads as necessary.

Best,
-rt


-- 
regards,
Reinhard


Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-05-28 Thread Birger Schacht
Hi Reinhard,

On 5/28/19 6:49 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Thanks for working on this package.
> 
> Do you plan to have this package team maintained in the golang team? If so,
> please let us know where on salsa you maintain the source package. I may be
> able to help out.

I maintain the source package on
https://salsa.debian.org/bisco-guest/conmon - but conmon is not a golang
project, it is C. But if there is another team that package fits, I'd be
happy to team maintain ;)

cheers,
Birger



Bug#929666: ITP: conmon -- An OCI container runtime monitor

2019-05-28 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Thanks for working on this package.

Do you plan to have this package team maintained in the golang team? If so,
please let us know where on salsa you maintain the source package. I may be
able to help out.

Best regards,
-rt

On Tue, May 28, 2019, 04:12 Birger Schacht  wrote:

> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Birger Schacht 
>
> * Package name: conmon
>   Version : 0.2.0
>   Upstream Author : Peter Hunt
> * URL : https://github.com/containers/conmon
> * License : Apache-2.0
>   Programming Lang: C
>   Description : An OCI container runtime monitor.
>
> Conmon is a monitoring program and communication tool between a
> container manager (like podman or CRI-O) and an OCI runtime (like runc
> or crun) for a single container.
> It is a run dependency for podman.
>
>