Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2021-10-03 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 3 October 2021 09:16 +02, Michael Stapelberg: > I will stress one more time that what we need here is not a one-time > sponsorship offer, but a multi-year commitment for maintaining the > i3-gaps package in Debian. Let's hear from antisocrates. I can offer a multi-year commitment for

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2021-10-03 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Personally, I don’t want gaps to be built from src:i3-wm. It’s enough work to maintain one version of i3. That said, sur5r is doing all of the Debian work since I retired from Debian, so it’s ultimately up to him. I will stress one more time that what we need here is not a one-time sponsorship

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2021-10-03 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 3 October 2021 08:48 +02, Michael Stapelberg: > I still think it’d be better to spend time on merging gaps rather than > packaging gaps, > but it seems like nobody has the skill set and/or motivation. This is a very different skillset from packaging. > Is there someone who would

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2021-10-03 Thread Michael Stapelberg
I still think it’d be better to spend time on merging gaps rather than packaging gaps, but it seems like nobody has the skill set and/or motivation. Is there someone who would continuously maintain i3-gaps in Debian? I wouldn’t want that package to diverge from upstream i3 in terms of which

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2021-10-03 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 17 June 2019 18:30 +02, Michael Stapelberg: > Ingo will outline what needs to be done to get i3-gaps into a mergable > state, so that we can eventually bring these features to all i3 users. > > For the time being, our recommendation is to NOT add i3-gaps to Debian or > any other Linux

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2019-06-18 Thread Michael Stapelberg
> Certainly, a merge is the superior solution and i am glad its actually being considered, but my understanding is that code refactoring/cleaning could take a considerable amount of time, and therefore the package should actually be available as a temporary solution for all those who want to use

Bug#930557: i3-gaps RFS/ITP

2019-06-17 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hey, thanks everyone for reaching out. The interest in making i3-gaps available to more people has prompted some discussion between Ingo (the maintainer of the i3-gaps fork, and an i3 core maintainer) and me. The key concern about the i3-gaps fork is code quality: the implementation cannot