On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:30 +, Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote:
> Hi Ritesh,
>
> Thanks for quick answers and the link to the enlightening bug report!
>
> I'm nevertheless the opinion, that some kind of more helpful
> reporting should be used.
If you care for it, you can come up with somethin
Hi Ritesh,
Thanks for quick answers and the link to the enlightening bug report!
I'm nevertheless the opinion, that some kind of more helpful reporting should
be used.
Perhaps upstream?
BR,
Silvano
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 17:39 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 09:21 +000
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 09:21 +, Cirujano Cuesta, Silvano wrote:
> IMHO it should be a "Depends" dependency, or at least a "Recommends"
> dependency.
We can't do that. The same is explained in the following bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877925
That is the reason
Package: bpfcc-tools
Version: 0.8.0-4
Executing execsnoop-bpfcc (and probably any of the other BCC tools) fails due
to a missing directory (/lib/modules/4.19.0-5-amd64/build) on an up-to-date
Buster system.
Installing 'linux-headers-amd64' (on an AMD64 system) resolved the issue.
This is an exa
4 matches
Mail list logo
