Hello,
On Sat 29 Jun 2019 at 03:36PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#930922: dgit: combination of -wgf and
> --include-dirty nukes untracked files"):
>> On Mon 24 Jun 2019 at 12:02pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> >> A possible al
Sean Whitton writes ("Re: Bug#930922: dgit: combination of -wgf and
--include-dirty nukes untracked files"):
> On Mon 24 Jun 2019 at 12:02pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> A possible alternative would be to actually add --include-all-dirty, but
> >> the problem in
Hello,
On Mon 24 Jun 2019 at 12:02pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> A possible alternative would be to actually add --include-all-dirty, but
>> the problem in #914317 suggests that might not be a great idea.
>
> Your --include-all-dirty is roughly equivalent to -wn or -wdd ?
If -wn and -wdd imply
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#930922: dgit: combination of -wgf and --include-dirty
nukes untracked files"):
> I agree that this is useful behaviour, but it strikes me as inconsistent
> UX. If you don't pass --include-dirty, then dgit treats changes to
> tracked files and
control: tag -1 + patch
Hello,
On Sat 22 Jun 2019 at 04:32pm +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#930922: dgit: combination of -wgf and
> --include-dirty nukes untracked files"):
>> The description of --include-dirty says that it tells dgit to "inclu
Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#930922: dgit: combination of -wgf and --include-dirty
nukes untracked files"):
> The description of --include-dirty says that it tells dgit to "include
> the changes from your working tree". However, with -wgf, what it
> actually does is
Hello,
On Sat 22 Jun 2019 at 04:08pm +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> The description of --include-dirty says that it tells dgit to "include
> the changes from your working tree". However, with -wgf, what it
> actually does is include changes to files that have already been
> committed, but not chan
Package: dgit
Version: 8.3
Severity: important
Hello,
The description of --include-dirty says that it tells dgit to "include
the changes from your working tree". However, with -wgf, what it
actually does is include changes to files that have already been
committed, but not changes in the form of
8 matches
Mail list logo
