[Adding 931...@bugs.debian.org to CC for visibility] Hi Michael,
> The underlying issue is still that this test is currently way too > primitive and produces too many false positives to be actually useful. > In #931889 I already listed some cases, where those false-positives are > triggered. Nod, and I ACK there is still further discussion to be had in this area. As I plan to release a new version of Lintian very soon (which will close the "pending" #931889...) let us keep this one (ie. #933109) open so this issue does not get lost. Thank you for caring about Lintian. :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk `-