Bug#932417: nmu: ocamlnet_4.1.2-3
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 09:21:19PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 22-07-2019 20:54, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:41:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> I'm relatively new on the team so give me some slack. There is a > >> permanent transition tracker for ocaml, so I *guess* this is handled > >> differently than via regular binNMU requests: > >> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html Is there anything > >> special here? > > > > nomeata has scripts to detect this kind of stuff, for ocaml here: > > https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-ocaml.txt > > Those files are written in a way you can just pipe them into `wb`. > > I noticed that. But is the RT doing that? Or do ocaml people have access > to wb to do this themselves? nomeata himself has wb access, and has been doing quite some of those binnmus in the past. However, at least in the last year, quite some of them were done by pochu instead, coordinated on IRC on #-haskell or similar channels. This is to say: I don't actually know where we are left, but I actually believe there is nothing really set and properly decided, it just happened to come up like that and that worked well enough that it stuck there (the fact that they run in a private cronjob on people.d.o should say enough). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#932417: nmu: ocamlnet_4.1.2-3
Hi, On 22-07-2019 20:54, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:41:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> I'm relatively new on the team so give me some slack. There is a >> permanent transition tracker for ocaml, so I *guess* this is handled >> differently than via regular binNMU requests: >> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html Is there anything >> special here? > > nomeata has scripts to detect this kind of stuff, for ocaml here: > https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-ocaml.txt > Those files are written in a way you can just pipe them into `wb`. I noticed that. But is the RT doing that? Or do ocaml people have access to wb to do this themselves? > Incidentally, IMHO ocaml and haskell have the same issue golang has > regarding security and stuff, but the release team never really bothered > with them much, I think you should definitely try to work out something > to track decently all these statically linked languages. It's mostly s/you/these statically linked language teams together with the security team/ here. The release team doesn't have the spoons to drive this. And I think the golang team will have to do some of that work if they want the golang ecosystem to be in bullseye. If nothing happens, golang is going to be removed from testing. Paul
Bug#932417: nmu: ocamlnet_4.1.2-3
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 08:41:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I'm relatively new on the team so give me some slack. There is a > permanent transition tracker for ocaml, so I *guess* this is handled > differently than via regular binNMU requests: > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html Is there anything > special here? nomeata has scripts to detect this kind of stuff, for ocaml here: https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-ocaml.txt Those files are written in a way you can just pipe them into `wb`. Incidentally, IMHO ocaml and haskell have the same issue golang has regarding security and stuff, but the release team never really bothered with them much, I think you should definitely try to work out something to track decently all these statically linked languages. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#932417: nmu: ocamlnet_4.1.2-3
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Kyle, On 19-07-2019 02:12, Kyle Robbertze wrote: > Please rebuild ocamlnet to use camlzip 1.08-1, uploaded to unstable > yesterday. Without this, ocamlnet fails to install as it depends on an > old build of camlzip. > > nmu ocamlnet_4.1.2-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against camlzip 1.08-1" I'm relatively new on the team so give me some slack. There is a permanent transition tracker for ocaml, so I *guess* this is handled differently than via regular binNMU requests: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html Is there anything special here? Paul
Bug#932417: nmu: ocamlnet_4.1.2-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please rebuild ocamlnet to use camlzip 1.08-1, uploaded to unstable yesterday. Without this, ocamlnet fails to install as it depends on an old build of camlzip. nmu ocamlnet_4.1.2-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against camlzip 1.08-1" -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: arm64, i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_ZA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
