Axel Beckert (2020-05-18):
> Found out what missing: Guillem's patched Makefile.am and also
> debian/control, but missed debian/aptitude-common.install, so the
> upstream build-system installed the file, but the package build system
> did not.
>
> Works now for me. Can continue on preparing a new
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Problem: It doesn't work for me, no more highlighting of new changelog
> entries — which I is why I haven't pushed my changes yet.
[...]
> You need to test it on upgradable packages. (And check how
> it looks without the patch first: All
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > After some thought, I think a local aptitude-specific wrapper might be
> > > even better and obviates the question of whether dpkg-parsechangelog
> > > should be moved or not. :)
> >
> > FWIW, this makes sense to me.
>
> Ack, and I'm actually on it. Tried to
Hi,
Guillem Jover (2019-08-09):
> After some thought, I think a local aptitude-specific wrapper might be
> even better and obviates the question of whether dpkg-parsechangelog
> should be moved or not. :)
FWIW, this makes sense to me.
> See the attached patch, which has seen no testing, but can
Hi!
On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 01:49:24 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm attaching an old patch I had around, which I thought I had sent
> > out, but apparently not (perhaps only on IRC), to switch to
> > libdpkg-perl's parser which is the successor of this package.
>
> Yay,
Hi Guillem,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> aptitude Recommends libparse-debianchangelog-perl, which has had no
> upstream maintainer since 2011.
Yes, I've asked Frank if he'd pass over upstream to someone else. No
response so far IIRC.
> I'm attaching an old patch I had around, which I thought I had
6 matches
Mail list logo
