> Erk. Why would they ship a header that errors instead of no file at all?
It seems the idea of not shipping it was proposed but dismissed:
https://libc-alpha.sourceware.narkive.com/NmybqkkT/patch-add-x32-dummy-sysctl#post5
As I parse this: attempting to use sysctl on x32 is a clear error, it
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 12:08, Laurence Parry wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps adding && !(__X86_64__ && __ILP32__) in there as well would fix
> > > it?
> >
> > That check is for sys/sysctl.h, if that file still exists on X32 then
> > it's not the right macro to fix.
> > A better fix would be around
> > Perhaps adding && !(__X86_64__ && __ILP32__) in there as well would fix it?
>
> That check is for sys/sysctl.h, if that file still exists on X32 then
> it's not the right macro to fix.
> A better fix would be around HAVE_DECL_RANDOM_UUID in config.h.guess.
> ...
> A suitable fix would be to
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 02:12, Laurence Parry wrote:
>
> Package: lua-luaossl
> Version: 20161208-3
> Tags: ftbfs
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: x32
>
> lua-luaoss fails to build from source on x32 because:
>
> In file included from
Package: lua-luaossl
Version: 20161208-3
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: x32
lua-luaoss fails to build from source on x32 because:
In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnux32/sys/sysctl.h:63:0,
from src/openssl.c:9089:
5 matches
Mail list logo
