Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Hey, > I've removed you as an uploader, and updated Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser in > control. I uploaded now the package to NEW queue, now we need to wait the ftp masters to accept. > > you should have enough permissions to push to this location. Please update > > the debian/control according to the new locations. > > I am getting > > remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on > this project. Okay - I'll give you Mantainers permission - now you should be able to push to every branch. > I've squashed the changelog entries into 0.10.2-1 as well. Thanks. > Let me know anything else I should do. Now after I've uploaded the to NEW queue, you need to create a (signed) tag (debian/0.10.2-1). I use `pkgkde-vcs tag -s` for this task. As always, if there are any questions, feel free to ask! hefee PS: are you joined the pkg-kde-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
>> I've changed the maintainer to be Qt/KDE, and changed my role to uploader >> (and I've added you there as well, is that appropriate?). > > No please remove myself from uploaders, as I'm only the sponsor. I do not > intend at the moment to care about new versions of kcollectd. You care about > the package and do the uploads! > > As we will manage this as part of the Qt/KDE team we also use a location that > reflects this: > https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/kcollectd I've removed you as an uploader, and updated Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser in control. > you should have enough permissions to push to this location. Please update > the > debian/control according to the new locations. I am getting remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on this project. while # ssh g...@salsa.debian.org Welcome to GitLab, @aerusso-guest! I've updated aerusso-guest/kcollectd, however (and mentors). > Are the version 0.10.2-1, 0.10.2-2 and 0.10.2-3 released somewhere (aka > Ubuntu > or anywhere else)? If not please merge the changelog entries, as it is unusal > to keep non released versions in changelog. > Normally you keep the last changelog entry open and just add new stuff until > we > release to Debian/Ubuntu. [1] I've squashed the changelog entries into 0.10.2-1 as well. Let me know anything else I should do. Thanks, Antonio
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Hey, > Thanks for looking at the package! I've corrected the missing build > dependencies, and cleaned up the debian directory a bit, as you suggested. cool, now it builds on my sbuilder too. > I've changed the maintainer to be Qt/KDE, and changed my role to uploader > (and I've added you there as well, is that appropriate?). No please remove myself from uploaders, as I'm only the sponsor. I do not intend at the moment to care about new versions of kcollectd. You care about the package and do the uploads! As we will manage this as part of the Qt/KDE team we also use a location that reflects this: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/kcollectd you should have enough permissions to push to this location. Please update the debian/control according to the new locations. Are the version 0.10.2-1, 0.10.2-2 and 0.10.2-3 released somewhere (aka Ubuntu or anywhere else)? If not please merge the changelog entries, as it is unusal to keep non released versions in changelog. Normally you keep the last changelog entry open and just add new stuff until we release to Debian/Ubuntu. [1] The rest I reviewed looks fine, so only these small bits from my side and we can upload. As always, if there are any questions, feel free to ask! hefee [1] https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/gitguidelines.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Thanks for the offer! I think a home with Qt/KDE team is for the best, as well. Antonio
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Hi Antonio! It seems you missed my mail to the wnpp bug, ( my fault, I should have CCed you) but better yet if Sandro can help here, he definitely knows the kde side of the team much better then I. Of course, feel free to ping me if necessary. Cheers, Lisandro
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Thanks for looking at the package! I've corrected the missing build dependencies, and cleaned up the debian directory a bit, as you suggested. I've changed the maintainer to be Qt/KDE, and changed my role to uploader (and I've added you there as well, is that appropriate?). The uploaded package was built by pbuilder. Thanks, Antonio On 9/1/19 6:44 AM, Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > > I can sponser you. But I can't build kcollectd pacakge from salsa[0]. It > looks > like you missing some dependencies from building. > > Feel free to ping me, if you have any questions and, when the package is > ready > to review. > > * you can remove the debian/patches directory completly, when there are no > patches to apply. > > Additionally you list yourself as Maintainer, that is fine. Do you want to be > part of Qt/KDE team and shift the maintainership to Qt/KDE team? This gives > other members of the team the possibility to touch the package and maybe to a > release, if needed... > > hefee > > [0] https://salsa.debian.org/aerusso-guest/kcollectd/ > > On Sonntag, 1. September 2019 00:54:16 CEST Antonio Russo wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I am looking for a new home for kcollectd, a tool for viewing log >> information, that was recently removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt >> 5 port [1]. I have ported that package and I've taken over the upstream >> (which has been dead for years) [2]. I'm offering to maintain the Debian >> package, and I've been directed here, at the suggestion of another DD, >> because this community may have interest in helping out with this package. >> >> Of note, I spoke with Scott Kitterman, who requested the removal of >> kcollectd, and he said he knows of no other reason the package should be >> removed. >> >> The updated packaging fixes several outstanding bugs, and makes the Debian >> lintian report much cleaner (one is, I believe, a false positive, and the >> other is due to lack of package tests which aren't really relevant to this >> kind of UI software). >> >> Is anyone here willing to sponsor this package, offer any criticism of >> the package, or further direct me to a place where I might get such help? >> >> Thank you, >> Antonio Russo >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/935223 >> [2] https://gitlab.com/aerusso/kcollectd >> [3] https://bugs.debian.org/935485 >
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Hey, I can sponser you. But I can't build kcollectd pacakge from salsa[0]. It looks like you missing some dependencies from building. Feel free to ping me, if you have any questions and, when the package is ready to review. * you can remove the debian/patches directory completly, when there are no patches to apply. Additionally you list yourself as Maintainer, that is fine. Do you want to be part of Qt/KDE team and shift the maintainership to Qt/KDE team? This gives other members of the team the possibility to touch the package and maybe to a release, if needed... hefee [0] https://salsa.debian.org/aerusso-guest/kcollectd/ On Sonntag, 1. September 2019 00:54:16 CEST Antonio Russo wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am looking for a new home for kcollectd, a tool for viewing log > information, that was recently removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt > 5 port [1]. I have ported that package and I've taken over the upstream > (which has been dead for years) [2]. I'm offering to maintain the Debian > package, and I've been directed here, at the suggestion of another DD, > because this community may have interest in helping out with this package. > > Of note, I spoke with Scott Kitterman, who requested the removal of > kcollectd, and he said he knows of no other reason the package should be > removed. > > The updated packaging fixes several outstanding bugs, and makes the Debian > lintian report much cleaner (one is, I believe, a false positive, and the > other is due to lack of package tests which aren't really relevant to this > kind of UI software). > > Is anyone here willing to sponsor this package, offer any criticism of > the package, or further direct me to a place where I might get such help? > > Thank you, > Antonio Russo > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/935223 > [2] https://gitlab.com/aerusso/kcollectd > [3] https://bugs.debian.org/935485 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#935485: Looking for help with a recently removed package, kcollectd
Hello everyone, I am looking for a new home for kcollectd, a tool for viewing log information, that was recently removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt 5 port [1]. I have ported that package and I've taken over the upstream (which has been dead for years) [2]. I'm offering to maintain the Debian package, and I've been directed here, at the suggestion of another DD, because this community may have interest in helping out with this package. Of note, I spoke with Scott Kitterman, who requested the removal of kcollectd, and he said he knows of no other reason the package should be removed. The updated packaging fixes several outstanding bugs, and makes the Debian lintian report much cleaner (one is, I believe, a false positive, and the other is due to lack of package tests which aren't really relevant to this kind of UI software). Is anyone here willing to sponsor this package, offer any criticism of the package, or further direct me to a place where I might get such help? Thank you, Antonio Russo [1] https://bugs.debian.org/935223 [2] https://gitlab.com/aerusso/kcollectd [3] https://bugs.debian.org/935485
Bug#935485: Looking for help to adopt recently removed package, kcollectd
Hi Antonio! On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:48:25 -0600 Antonio Russo wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been following a bit of a breadcrumb trail, and I hope I'm in the right > place now. kcollectd, a tool for viewing log information, has recently been > removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt 5 port [1]. I have ported that > package and I've taken over the upstream (which has been dead for years) [2]. > I'm offering to maintain the Debian package, but I have received very little > response to my ITA RFS bug [3]. Should I refile this as an ITP bug, since the > package has, in fact, already been removed? > > I spoke with Scott Kitterman, who requested the removal, and he said > knows of no other reason the package should be removed. The updated > packaging fixes several outstanding bugs, and makes the Debian lintian > report much cleaner (one is, I believe, a false positive, and the other > is due to lack of package tests which aren't really relevant to this kind of > UI software). > > Is anyone here willing to sponsor this package, offer any criticism of > the package, or direct me to a place where I might get such help? I'll happily sponsor you. If you do IRC I'm lisandro on oftc, feel free to ping me, specially on #debian-kde
Bug#935485: Looking for help to adopt recently removed package, kcollectd
Hello everyone, I've been following a bit of a breadcrumb trail, and I hope I'm in the right place now. kcollectd, a tool for viewing log information, has recently been removed from unstable because it lacked a Qt 5 port [1]. I have ported that package and I've taken over the upstream (which has been dead for years) [2]. I'm offering to maintain the Debian package, but I have received very little response to my ITA RFS bug [3]. Should I refile this as an ITP bug, since the package has, in fact, already been removed? I spoke with Scott Kitterman, who requested the removal, and he said knows of no other reason the package should be removed. The updated packaging fixes several outstanding bugs, and makes the Debian lintian report much cleaner (one is, I believe, a false positive, and the other is due to lack of package tests which aren't really relevant to this kind of UI software). Is anyone here willing to sponsor this package, offer any criticism of the package, or direct me to a place where I might get such help? Thank you, Antonio Russo [1] https://bugs.debian.org/935223 [2] https://gitlab.com/aerusso/kcollectd [3] https://bugs.debian.org/935485
