Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 14:24:05 +0300,
Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Package: gnustep-base-runtime
> Version: 1.26.0-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
Many thanks for the report but like Michael Biebl I disagree with the
severity. This
[somehow messed up the CC list, s/pkg-gnome/pkg-systemd/]
Am 01.09.19 um 14:44 schrieb Alan Jenkins:
> On 01/09/2019 12:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>> Package: gnustep-base-runtime
>>> Version: 1.26.0-4
>>> Severity: grave
>>> Tags: security
>>>
On 01/09/2019 12:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
Package: gnustep-base-runtime
Version: 1.26.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
dependency of
On 01.09.19 13:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I guess gnustep-base-runtime explicitly needs to remove the existing
> /etc/rc?.d/???gdomap symlinks on upgrades in preinst (possibly guarded
> by a check which reads the old /etc/default/gdomap and tests if
> ENABLED=NO) so they can be properly re-created
On 01.09.19 13:24, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Package: gnustep-base-runtime
> Version: 1.26.0-4
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
> dependency of "unar".
>
> When I
Package: gnustep-base-runtime
Version: 1.26.0-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Dear Maintainer,
I had "gnustep-base-runtime" installed on my system, probably as a
dependency of "unar".
When I upgrade from Debian 9 to Debian 10 (and reboot), there is a
network
6 matches
Mail list logo
