Bug#939650: libvdpau: please make the build reproducible

2019-09-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Luca,

> I am not sure I follow though - I do not see those files that the repro
> build is complaining about in the latest upload? Do they appear because
> of a new version of tex or something like that?

Hm that is indeed rather likely. Now that I think of it more explicitly,
I have seen other misc LaTeX things recently in a Reproducible Builds
context.


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org  chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-



Bug#939650: libvdpau: please make the build reproducible

2019-09-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 10:36:31 +0100 "Chris Lamb" <
la...@debian.org
> wrote:
> Source: libvdpau
> Version: 1.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: 
reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org

> Usertags: timestamps
> X-Debbugs-Cc: 
reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed
> that libvdpau could not be built reproducibly.
> 
> This is because it included build paths in (somewhat useless!)
> log files. Patch attached that simply doesn't ship these in
> the binary package. This is similar to #939548 [1] in dsdp.
> 
> Patch attached.

Hello,

Thanks for the report and patch, applied and pushed to git.

I am not sure I follow though - I do not see those files that the repro
build is complaining about in the latest upload? Do they appear because
of a new version of tex or something like that?

https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libvdpau-doc/filelist

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#939650: libvdpau: please make the build reproducible

2019-09-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: libvdpau
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed
that libvdpau could not be built reproducibly.

This is because it included build paths in (somewhat useless!)
log files. Patch attached that simply doesn't ship these in
the binary package. This is similar to #939548 [1] in dsdp.

Patch attached.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/
 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/939548


Regards,

-- 
  ,''`.
 : :'  : Chris Lamb
 `. `'`  la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
   `-
--- a/debian/rules  2019-09-07 10:10:56.887480026 +0100
--- b/debian/rules  2019-09-07 10:19:08.226064740 +0100
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
dh_auto_configure -- $(CONFIGURE_OPTIONS)
 
 override_dh_installdocs:
-   dh_installdocs -X.md5
+   dh_installdocs -X.md5 -X/_formulas. -X/_form0.
 
 override_dh_bugfiles:
dh_bugfiles -A