Bug#942059: gcc-9-cross: uses “long” as “time_t” leading to failure on most new 32-bit architectures

Control: reassign -1 src:gcc-9-cross Control: found -1 12 On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: reassign -1 src:gcc-9-cross-ports No, this is wrong. It may fail in src:gcc-9-cross-ports (= 10) as well (which it does according to

Bug#942059: gcc-9-cross: uses “long” as “time_t” leading to failure on most new 32-bit architectures

Matthias Klose writes: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: reassign -1 src:gcc-9-cross-ports > > As always, I appreciate your detailed analysis, level of detail > (including the gcc-9-source version number), and thoroughly written > bug report. No, most 32bit archs build fine, it's just

Bug#942059: gcc-9-cross: uses “long” as “time_t” leading to failure on most new 32-bit architectures

Matthias Klose writes: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: reassign -1 src:gcc-9-cross-ports > > As always, I appreciate your detailed analysis, level of detail > (including the gcc-9-source version number), and thoroughly written > bug report. No, most 32bit archs build fine, it's just

Bug#942059: gcc-9-cross: uses “long” as “time_t” leading to failure on most new 32-bit architectures

Control: severity -1 important Control: reassign -1 src:gcc-9-cross-ports As always, I appreciate your detailed analysis, level of detail (including the gcc-9-source version number), and thoroughly written bug report. No, most 32bit archs build fine, it's just x32 having that issue. On

Bug#942059: gcc-9-cross: uses “long” as “time_t” leading to failure on most new 32-bit architectures

Source: gcc-9-cross Version: 12 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) x86_64-linux-gnux32-g++-9 -fno-PIE -c -g -I-I../../src/gcc/gm2 -Igm2 -I../../src/gcc/gm2/gm2-gcc -Igm2/gm2-gcc -g -O2 -DIN_GCC