intrigeri:
> Hi,
>
> Ximin Luo:
>> Who is using reprepro to archive Debian Rust packages? That's the
>> first time I've heard of this.
>
> I'm happy to document one specific example, in the hope that it helps
> this discussion adopt a user-centric approach :)
>
Users do not care about
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:06:00 + Ximin Luo
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + wontfix
>
Debian should remove this kind of packages immediately. No way to make
a Debian Sid installer with Simple-CDD now. The Rust language is for
people who make null pointer and buffer overflow bugs and those
people
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I will see how to add a lintian check to block that from happening again.
FWIW, I already filed #942493 against lintian this morning.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + wontfix
This is clearly not acceptable. You can't ignore problems like this one.
I saw you already broke debian-installer once with the former packages
that overflowed the 16K limit of cdebootstrap. Now it's the turn of
reprepro and this
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Ansgar:
> Sylvestre Ledru writes:
>> Le 17/10/2019 à 09:25, Ansgar a écrit :
>>> in addition a 256kB Provides field seems very hard on the total size of
>>> the Packages index. Please don't do that...
>>>
>> To be clear, this isn't done by a human. This is a tool
Sylvestre Ledru writes:
> Le 17/10/2019 à 09:25, Ansgar a écrit :
>> in addition a 256kB Provides field seems very hard on the total size of
>> the Packages index. Please don't do that...
>>
> To be clear, this isn't done by a human. This is a tool generating
> this for us.
Then the tool has a
Le 17/10/2019 à 09:25, Ansgar a écrit :
Hi,
in addition a 256kB Provides field seems very hard on the total size of
the Packages index. Please don't do that...
To be clear, this isn't done by a human. This is a tool generating this for us.
I will see how to add a lintian check to block that
7 matches
Mail list logo
