Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Hi Santiago, On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 09:41 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > Hi Ritesh, > > When trying to upload I realized the format of the package is that of > a > native package, but the version has a revision at the same time. > Which I > think it is unusual. > I don't understand how the package is built (at least using gbp). > Could > you please tell me how to do you build the package? And even, fell > free > to upload it yourself, to avoid duplicating work. For Buster, I need to add debian/gbp.conf but meanwhile you can build it like this: rrs@priyasi:~/rrs-home/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux (buster)$ pdebuild --debbuildopts "-i.git -I.git -S" dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: linux-source-4.19 docbook-to-man libvdeplug2-dev libpcap-dev libssl-dev W: Unmet build-dependency in source dpkg-query: no packages found matching linux-source-4.19 (cd linux-source-4.19 && QUILT_PATCHES=/home/rrs/NoBackup/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux/debian/patches quilt pop -a || /bin/true) /bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to linux-source-4.19 rm -rf patch-stamp linux-source-4.19/.pc dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f unpack-stamp build-stamp configure-stamp rm -rf linux-source-4.19 linux.uml.1 /home/rrs/NoBackup/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux/debian/uml-modules changelog dh_clean dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in debian/source/format, see dpkg-source(1) dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'user-mode-linux' is not - 'user-mode-linux-4.19-1um' dpkg-source: info: using source format '1.0' dpkg-source: info: building user-mode-linux in user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1+deb10u1.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building user-mode-linux in user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1+deb10u1.dsc I: Generating source changes file for original dsc dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload ERROR: ld.so: object 'libeatmydata.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored. I: pbuilder: network access will be disabled during build I: Current time: Thu Mar 5 18:37:58 IST 2020 I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1583413678 I: Building the build Environment On the other hand, for the master branch it already has debian/gbp.conf . So a simple gbp buildpackage will work there. rrs@priyasi:~/rrs-home/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux (master)$ gbp buildpackage -S gbp:info: Performing the build dpkg-checkbuilddeps: error: Unmet build dependencies: linux-source-5.4 docbook-to-man libvdeplug2-dev libpcap-dev libssl-dev gcc-multilib W: Unmet build-dependency in source dpkg-query: no packages found matching linux-source-5.4 (cd linux-source-5.4 && QUILT_PATCHES=/home/rrs/NoBackup/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux/debian/patches quilt pop -a || /bin/true) /bin/sh: 1: cd: can't cd to linux-source-5.4 rm -rf patch-stamp linux-source-5.4/.pc dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f unpack-stamp build-stamp configure-stamp rm -rf linux-source-5.4 linux.uml.1 /home/rrs/NoBackup/Community/Packaging/uml/user-mode-linux/debian/uml-modules changelog dh_clean dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in debian/source/format, see dpkg-source(1) dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'user-mode-linux' is not - 'user-mode-linux-5.4-1um' dpkg-source: info: using source format '1.0' dpkg-source: info: building user-mode-linux in user-mode-linux_5.4-1um-2.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: building user-mode-linux in user-mode-linux_5.4-1um-2.dsc I: Generating source changes file for original dsc dpkg-genchanges: info: including full source code in upload ERROR: ld.so: object 'libeatmydata.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded (cannot open shared object file): ignored. [sudo] password for rrs: I: pbuilder: network access will be disabled during build I: Current time: Thu Mar 5 18:35:49 IST 2020 I: pbuilder-time-stamp: 1583413549 I: Building the build Environment About the revision format, I agree that it is a confusing one. I have no context why Mattia Dongli (previous UML maintainer, now retired) chose that format, or the maintainer before him. So far I had been carrying it forward as is. But I guess, some day, I'd want to get away from it. My wild guess is is that it must have been done so for ABI checks; something that I never cared for since I took up the maintenance. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
El 26/02/20 a las 11:10, Santiago R.R. escribió: > Hi Ritesh, > > I've just made another MR to modify the changelog entry. > > Also, please, remember to create a tag for the release once it get > approved (and uploaded). Hi Ritesh, When trying to upload I realized the format of the package is that of a native package, but the version has a revision at the same time. Which I think it is unusual. I don't understand how the package is built (at least using gbp). Could you please tell me how to do you build the package? And even, fell free to upload it yourself, to avoid duplicating work. Thanks, -- Santiago signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Hi Ritesh, I've just made another MR to modify the changelog entry. Also, please, remember to create a tag for the release once it get approved (and uploaded). Cheers, -- Santiago signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
El 24/02/20 a las 15:29, Ritesh Raj Sarraf escribió: > Sorry. I hadn't realized that you already had MRs on Salsa. But I > wasn't aware of the extra configuration needed for notifications. Mmm, maybe I had to continue using the BTS, instead of the MR. At least for communicating with you. > > Please go ahead with the upload. Thanks! I've just filed a bug report against release.d.o to ask for an OK from the RMs. ... > On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:16 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Hi Santiago, > > > > Do you have the MR ready ? > > > > Your bug report against the package in Buster has caused a trigger to > > auto-remove UML from Debian Testing. I don't know how removing the > > package from testing solves any problem with the package in Buster. ... Good question. But anyway, I hope I will be able to upload before the automatic auto-removal deadline. Cheers, - srr signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Sorry. I hadn't realized that you already had MRs on Salsa. But I wasn't aware of the extra configuration needed for notifications. Please go ahead with the upload. Thanks, Ritesh On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:16 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > Do you have the MR ready ? > > Your bug report against the package in Buster has caused a trigger to > auto-remove UML from Debian Testing. I don't know how removing the > package from testing solves any problem with the package in Buster. > > > If you have the MR done, can we please get it merged and get done > with > this bug report ? > > Thanks, > Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Hi Santiago, Do you have the MR ready ? Your bug report against the package in Buster has caused a trigger to auto-remove UML from Debian Testing. I don't know how removing the package from testing solves any problem with the package in Buster. If you have the MR done, can we please get it merged and get done with this bug report ? Thanks, Ritesh On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 13:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Santiago, > > On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > > BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. > > But > > I > > am not sure against which branch should I propose a MR. > > Thank you for taking care of the packages in Buster. I just created a > branch for Buster. You can prepare your changes against that branch. > > https://salsa.debian.org/uml-team/user-mode-linux/tree/buster > > -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Hi Santiago, On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:46 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote: > BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. But > I > am not sure against which branch should I propose a MR. Thank you for taking care of the packages in Buster. I just created a branch for Buster. You can prepare your changes against that branch. https://salsa.debian.org/uml-team/user-mode-linux/tree/buster -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#951329: FTBFS in buster with linux-source-4.19 4.19.98-1
Package: user-mode-linux Version: 4.19-1um-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Dear maintainer, The current user-mode-linux package in buster fails to build the latest linux kernel in buster due to the fix-port-helper-path.patch: Applying patch /build/user-mode-linux-4.19-1um/debian/patches/fix-port-helper-path.patch patching file arch/um/drivers/port_user.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 168. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/um/drivers/port_user.c Patch /build/user-mode-linux-4.19-1um/debian/patches/fix-port-helper-path.patch can be reverse-applied make: *** [debian/rules:54: patch-stamp] Error 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 I: copying local configuration E: Failed autobuilding of package Removing it solves the issue: diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 5f98481..29faa0f 100644 --- a/debian/patches/series +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ 05_fix_static_build.patch 06-fix-linkage-on-386-arch.patch 07-remove-rpath.patch -fix-port-helper-path.patch BTW, I will prepare a git branch in my personal salsa namespace. But I am not sure against which branch should I propose a MR. Cheers, -- Santiago -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=es_CO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages user-mode-linux depends on: ii libc6 2.29-10 Versions of packages user-mode-linux recommends: ii uml-utilities 20070815.3-1 Versions of packages user-mode-linux suggests: ii rootstrap 0.3.25-1 ii rxvt-unicode [x-terminal-emulator]9.22-6+b2 pn slirp ii terminator [x-terminal-emulator] 1.91-4 ii user-mode-linux-doc 20060501-3 pn vde2 ii xfce4-terminal [x-terminal-emulator] 0.8.9.1-1 ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 353-1 -- no debconf information
