Hello,
On Wed 15 Jul 2020 at 05:19PM +02, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. I'm glad that ublock-origin hasn't been simply
> forgotten. However I'd like to suggest to implement a strict FIFO queue
> because now it is more like FILO. This would automatically reduce
> support
Hello,
Am 14.07.20 um 17:22 schrieb Sean Whitton:
[...]
>> Please clarify the status of ublock-origin and why it is still in the
>> NEW queue.
>
> Simply that we do not have enough active FTP team members.
>
> Just to note that being in binary-NEW makes no difference; it gets a
> full check as
Hello,
On Tue 14 Jul 2020 at 10:19AM +02, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I am reaching out to you because the Firefox/Chromium addon
> ublock-origin is still in the NEW queue despite being uploaded four
> months ago. The package is not really new in Debian and it is quite
> unusual that a binary-new
Dear ftp team,
I am reaching out to you because the Firefox/Chromium addon
ublock-origin is still in the NEW queue despite being uploaded four
months ago. The package is not really new in Debian and it is quite
unusual that a binary-new package has been stuck in the queue for such a
long time.
4 matches
Mail list logo
