Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

2020-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Peter, On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:26:59PM +0100, peter green wrote: > It seems that the old igraph binaries were removed and this bug report was > downgraded but python3-igraph is still present on the FTBFS architectures and > still build-depends on libigraph-dev I realised this as well.

Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

2020-04-23 Thread peter green
Hi It seems that the old igraph binaries were removed and this bug report was downgraded but python3-igraph is still present on the FTBFS architectures and still build-depends on libigraph-dev I also find it strange that python3-igraph has a build-dependency but not a runtime dependency on

Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

2020-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/igraph/igraph/issues/1370

Bug#956821: igraph: FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

2020-04-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: igraph Version: 0.8.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) igraph failed to build almost everywhere. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=igraph=sid Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher