Bug#958841: Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:02:11PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Alright, then I recommend this: > > reassign 958841 src:erlang 1:22.3.2+dfsg-1 > > clone 958841 -1 > > reassign -1 src:elixir-lang 1.9.1.dfsg-1.3 > > retitle -1 elixir-lang: incompatible with erlang 22 > > #

Bug#958841: Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, tl;dr I'll remove elixir-lang from testing in 15 days if the elixir-lang issue isn't by then. On 03-05-2020 12:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> It's not a desirable output here. This means that without some changes >> in elixir-lang >> new erlang packages will never reach testing. Well, that

Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Mattia, Sergei, On 03-05-2020 11:11, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > The autoremoval is quite confusing (perhaps actually buggy?) when bugs > are assigned against multiple packages. Our autoremoval script queries UDD [1], so UDD got it wrong. I didn't check yet, but I suspect that UDD, like britney,

Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 12:58:19PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > Well, that bug is assigned to *both* erlang and erlang-elixir, and in > > fact, the fix was done in erlang, so it really much looks like an erlang > > bug? > > It wasn't really a fix, I just bumped the erlang-pcre virtual package

Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Mattia, On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 12:11 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:39:51AM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: > > Today, I've got an autoremoval mails for erlang and a whole bunch of related > > packages because of #958841 (see [1] for details). > > > > Is it really

Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:39:51AM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Today, I've got an autoremoval mails for erlang and a whole bunch of related > packages because of #958841 (see [1] for details). > > Is it really necessary to remove erlang and all its reverse dependencies, > while it's

Bug#959505: release.debian.org: Is erlang autoremoval is necessary?

2020-05-03 Thread Sergei Golovan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi release team! Today, I've got an autoremoval mails for erlang and a whole bunch of related packages because of #958841 (see [1] for details). Is it really necessary to remove erlang and all its reverse dependencies, while it's elixir-lang which is