Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
On 2020-06-03 16:25:12 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2020-05-30 16:58, Drew Parsons wrote: > > On 2020-05-30 15:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > > Please go ahead with the uploads to unstable. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Thanks Sebastian. I'll proceed, starting with mumps. > > > Transition is all done (apart from siconos). I've added a removal hint for siconos some days ago and cruft got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
On 2020-05-30 16:58, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2020-05-30 15:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Please go ahead with the uploads to unstable. Cheers Thanks Sebastian. I'll proceed, starting with mumps. Transition is all done (apart from siconos). Drew
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
On 2020-05-30 15:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Control: block -1 by 961708 Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Drew On 2020-05-22 11:24:26 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2020-05-21 23:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Did you test if the reverse dependencies build with the new mumps, petsc > and slepc stack? > I've tested most of them, coinor-ipopt getfem++ rheolef sdpa dolfin getdp sundials. Also freefem++. All build fine. I didn't test trilinos and deal.ii because of the long build time (3-10 hours). trilinos already fails to build (#961708), but with the Makefile issue fixed it builds fine against the new mumps. deal.ii also builds fine. siconos has other problems, it's already not building. FTR, this is now #961735. Please go ahead with the uploads to unstable. Cheers Thanks Sebastian. I'll proceed, starting with mumps. Drew
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
Control: block -1 by 961708 Control: tags -1 + confirmed Hi Drew On 2020-05-22 11:24:26 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2020-05-21 23:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Did you test if the reverse dependencies build with the new mumps, petsc > > and slepc stack? > > > > I've tested most of them, > coinor-ipopt getfem++ rheolef sdpa dolfin getdp sundials. Also > freefem++. > All build fine. > > I didn't test trilinos and deal.ii because of the long build time (3-10 > hours). trilinos already fails to build (#961708), but with the Makefile issue fixed it builds fine against the new mumps. deal.ii also builds fine. > siconos has other problems, it's already not building. FTR, this is now #961735. Please go ahead with the uploads to unstable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
No please enlighten me on my part in this please sir On Thu, May 21, 2020, 9:45 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi Drew > > On 2020-05-20 00:48:48 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > I think the joint mumps 5.3.1 / petsc 3.13 / slepc 3.13 transition is > > ready to proceed. Packages seem well behaved in experimental. > > Did you test if the reverse dependencies build with the new mumps, petsc > and slepc stack? > > Cheers > -- > Sebastian Ramacher >
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
On 2020-05-21 23:42, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Did you test if the reverse dependencies build with the new mumps, petsc and slepc stack? I've tested most of them, coinor-ipopt getfem++ rheolef sdpa dolfin getdp sundials. Also freefem++. All build fine. I didn't test trilinos and deal.ii because of the long build time (3-10 hours). siconos has other problems, it's already not building. Drew
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Drew On 2020-05-20 00:48:48 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > I think the joint mumps 5.3.1 / petsc 3.13 / slepc 3.13 transition is > ready to proceed. Packages seem well behaved in experimental. Did you test if the reverse dependencies build with the new mumps, petsc and slepc stack? Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#961053: transition: mumps petsc slepc
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I think the joint mumps 5.3.1 / petsc 3.13 / slepc 3.13 transition is ready to proceed. Packages seem well behaved in experimental. Auto transition trackers are already in place.
