Felix Lechner wrote:
> Forgive me, but I do not follow your logic. We do not fix experimental
> tags?
I did not intend to imply that. Whatever we decide to with this tag
(or whether people should file bugs or even use experimental mode) the
solution is surely not to add an allow list.
I really
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:24 AM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> (Felix, please consider reverting your change to 12cd485d until we
> have consensus here.)
Forgive me, but I do not follow your logic. We do not fix experimental
tags? How are they supposed to get better?
I would agree to a
tags 962448 + moreinfo
tags 962448 - pending
thanks
Hi,
> mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Java
> Maintainers
>
> The address is valid and the team doesn't plan to migrate 1000+ packages
> to a different address.
You appear to be running Lintian configured to show
Package: lintian
Version: 2.80.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
Lintian reports a mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure warning
for the packages maintained by the Java Team:
mailing-list-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure Debian Java Maintainers
The address is valid and the team doesn't plan
4 matches
Mail list logo
