Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-15 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-07-15 15:45:42 +0200, jspri...@debian.org wrote: > Hi, > > seems like this was not enough: > > /usr/bin/ld: > /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/9/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/libignition-fuel_tools4.so: > undefined reference to `ignition::msgs::FuelMetadata::FuelMetadata()' > >

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-15 Thread jspricke
Hi, seems like this was not enough: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/9/../../../aarch64-linux-gnu/libignition-fuel_tools4.so: undefined reference to `ignition::msgs::FuelMetadata::FuelMetadata()'

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-14 Thread jspricke
* Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-13 13:21]: Depends: libprotobuf-dev (>= ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}), libprotobuf-dev (< ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}a) override_dh_gencontrol: dh_gencontrol -- -Vprotobuf:Upstream-Version="$(shell dpkg-query -W -f '$${Source:Upstream-Version}'

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-13 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2020-07-12 16:39:34, jspri...@debian.org wrote: > * László Böszörményi (GCS) [2020-07-12 10:56]: > > > Since ignition-msgs is the only package that has this issue, something > > > like the following should be enough: > > > > > > In debian/control: > > > > > > Depends: libprotobuf-dev (>=

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-12 Thread jspricke
* László Böszörményi (GCS) [2020-07-12 10:56]: Since ignition-msgs is the only package that has this issue, something like the following should be enough: In debian/control: Depends: libprotobuf-dev (>= ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}), libprotobuf-dev (< ${protobuf:Upstream-Version}.1) In

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-12 Thread GCS
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:28 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2020-07-11 22:51:13 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > As far as I understand it, a tighter dependency would make britney > consider them as having to transition together, avoiding the issue with > the autopkgtests. It would

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2020-07-11 22:51:13 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 5:53 PM wrote: > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-11 16:54]: > > So it should work if all migrate at the same time, right? > It would work if all packages migrate at the same time. It will not >

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-11 Thread GCS
Hi, On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 5:53 PM wrote: > * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-11 16:54]: > So it should work if all migrate at the same time, right? It would work if all packages migrate at the same time. It will not do that automatically however, as auto testing will constantly fail. It tests

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-11 Thread jspricke
Hi Sebastian, * Sebastian Ramacher [2020-07-11 16:54]: While the rebuilds succeeded, the autopkgtests triggered by protobuf for the version of ignition-fuel-tools, ignition-msgs and ignition-transport now fail due to the same error. I guess you refer to:

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-07-11 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Jochen On 2020-06-21 13:38:04 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > Source: ignition-fuel-tools > Severity: normal > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Tags: upstream ftbfs > > Hi, > > Soon the Protobuf transition will start. Your package FTBFS with

Bug#963247: ignition-fuel-tools FTBFS with Protobuf 3.12.3

2020-06-21 Thread GCS
Source: ignition-fuel-tools Severity: normal Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: upstream ftbfs Hi, Soon the Protobuf transition will start. Your package FTBFS with the Protobuf 3.12.3-1 version, currently in experimental. The relevant lines