tony mancill a écrit le 05/09/2020 à 22:29 :
> One more comment on the patch for this bug...
>
> It's a little odd that we're patching the build system for a specific
> version of json-simple *at build time* when none of the binary packages
> declares a dependency on this.
>
> For a short period
Thank you for the patch Gilles. Could you also push it upstream?
Emmanuel Bourg
One more comment on the patch for this bug...
It's a little odd that we're patching the build system for a specific
version of json-simple *at build time* when none of the binary packages
declares a dependency on this.
For a short period of time we're going to end up with a binary package
built
Hi Gilles,
I did some basic smoke-testing with the derby package after applying
your patch and it looks good to me. I will prepare an upload.
Thank you for the patch!
tony
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 03:04:43PM +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> Could you please review / apply this
Hi Emmanuel,
Could you please review / apply this patch? Derby is the last blocker
for this json-simple transition.
Thanks in advance.
_g.
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:37:35 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Package: src:derby
> Version: 10.14.2.0-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd
Package: src:derby
Version: 10.14.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'd like to transition json-simple 3.1.1 to unstable, but derby is a blocker
since it builds against libjson-simple-java << 3 only.
The json-simple classes used by derby
6 matches
Mail list logo
