Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-21 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > May be I misunderstood you - but if you do not run the test at all > > (as done in some architectures) how will you know whether the test > > might fail?  May be

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 05:30:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > May be I misunderstood you - but if you do not run the test at all > (as done in some architectures) how will you know whether the test > might fail? May be I miss your point here and thus I implemented > my suggestion and we'll

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:26:41AM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge the fact that a test runs on amd64 but fails > > on some other architecture is not only caused by issues in the tool > > chain.  For instance recently I learned that for instance if char is

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-21 Thread Uecker, Martin
Hi Andreas, Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 09:45 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 05:50:34PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether this is a good idea in general.  If > > > we can be sure that for s390x there is an issue with the > > > tool

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 05:50:34PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > I'm not sure whether this is a good idea in general.  If > > we can be sure that for s390x there is an issue with the > > tool chain I could imagine something like: > > > >   if build on s390x > >   run_test ||

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-19 Thread Uecker, Martin
Am Samstag, den 19.09.2020, 17:09 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Martin, > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 01:15:47PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x > > > remains a release critical bug, since s390x is a release architecture.

Bug#969804: Bug#969804: bart: autopkgtest should be marked superficial

2020-09-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 01:15:47PM +, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > The severity on this bug can be downgraded, however the FTBFS on s390x > > remains a release critical bug, since s390x is a release architecture. > > > > Either the FTBFS gets fixed, or removal of the s390x binaries