On Friday, 16 October 2020 1:39:04 AM AEDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Though I do understand your point of view, if you don't know anything
> about OpenStack, Ceph, Zookeeper, etc. Truth is, Gnocchi should be
> working better if setup with at least keystone for auth (though Keystone
> is probably the
On 10/13/20 12:29 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 8:50:29 PM AEDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Instead, we could imagine prompting for a UUID if none is set, though
>> I'm not really convince that this would be the correct thing to do.
>
> Why not change the package description
On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 8:50:29 PM AEDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Instead, we could imagine prompting for a UUID if none is set, though
> I'm not really convince that this would be the correct thing to do.
Why not change the package description to indicate that it's not designed for
any
Package: gnocchi-common
Version: 4.3.1-3
Severity: normal
The resource_id setting has the UUID used for gnocchi-statsd, if you don't use
the statsd then
I don't think setting it does any harm but if you do (which is probably the
common case) then
not setting it automatically just causes more
4 matches
Mail list logo
