Bug#972246: numba ftbfs in unstable with python3.9 as supported python3 version

2021-01-16 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: numba Followup-For: Bug #972246 X-Debbugs-Cc: Andreas Tille Hi Andreas, check the upstream bug. The fix was merged only 4 days ago, 0.52.0 does not have it. We could try backporting PR#6579 to 0.52.0. Maybe it will work but there is a reasonable chance that it won't.

Bug#972246: numba ftbfs in unstable with python3.9 as supported python3 version

2020-11-29 Thread Drew Parsons
Source: numba Followup-For: Bug #972246 Control: severity -1 important >From 0.51.2-2 numba is configured to build python3.8 only (small patch, easily reverted once ready for python3.9). >From 0.51.2-6 all debci tests pass (with python3.8), including armhf (after skipping

Bug#972246: numba ftbfs in unstable with python3.9 as supported python3 version

2020-10-16 Thread Stefano Rivera
Looks like it's going to take a while to get Python 3.9 support in the numba stack: https://github.com/numba/numba/issues/6345#issuecomment-706722002 This isn't just a little python library, it's a Python JIT for Python, so I'd believe that supporting 3.9 is non-trivial. SR -- Stefano Rivera

Bug#972246: numba ftbfs in unstable with python3.9 as supported python3 version

2020-10-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:numba Version: 0.51.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid bullseye ftbfs numba ftbfs in unstable, different failures on some architectures. See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=numba - test suite time outs ? - packaging errors (armel, mips64el, ppc64el, ...)