Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2021-03-04 Thread Ivo De Decker
# clarify issue in 972936 retitle 972936 removal of libgcc-s1 breaks the whole system fixed 972936 10.2.0-16 # # purely cosmetic, as this specific issue is fixed severity 964477 serious thanks Hi, On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:31:07AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2021-03-03 Thread Matthias Klose
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964477#69 now claims this is gone with the removal of gcc-8

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2021-02-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 10:07, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 2/14/21 5:58 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Obviously, the transitional packages would ideally be built by src:gcc-10 >> rather than being a separate source package, and Ryan only prototyped them >> as a separate source package to be able

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2021-02-13 Thread Phil Morrell
Thanks to bits from the RT. I can't reproduce this issue on a minimal installation, and the upgrade path has also been fixed #972820. -- Phil Morrell (emorrp1) ``` $ sudo sbuild-createchroot --command-prefix=eatmydata --include=eatmydata buster --chroot-prefix=temporary /srv/chroot/temporary

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Control: subscribe -1 On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: severity -1 grave > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:44:44PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > > > On 10/26/20 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Package: libgcc-s1 > > >

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 grave On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 12:44:44PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On 10/26/20 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: libgcc-s1 > > Version: 10.2.0-15 > > Severity: grave > > > > On a buster system, with unstable pinned to low

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: severity -1 important On 10/26/20 1:04 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: libgcc-s1 > Version: 10.2.0-15 > Severity: grave > > On a buster system, with unstable pinned to low priority: Lowering the severity. Feel free to correct me if this specific configuration deserves RC severity.

Bug#972936: libgcc-s1 needs Breaks: libgcc1 (<< 1:10)

2020-10-26 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libgcc-s1 Version: 10.2.0-15 Severity: grave On a buster system, with unstable pinned to low priority: # apt-get install libgcc-s1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: gcc-10-base